Even in a LOSS hopkins = WINNER

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by at1, Apr 20, 2008.


  1. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    Fact is joe had alot of problems ****ing with hopkins i felt hopkins won 1-6 easy and 2 rounds was toss ups hopkins proved that even at 43 Joe can't do much joe really didnt do much besides throw punches that didnt really land and he got credit for them thats how he won hopkins stoped throwing alot joe threw and missed but because he was more active he won had he faced a even 40 year old hopkins he would have lost
     
  2. YOUNG*LORD

    YOUNG*LORD Carlosv1968 is your daddy Full Member

    2,298
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    I think the word you were looking for was whiner not winner.
     
  3. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Hopkins exposed himself as a dirty, lowdown, cheating sorebitch loser in this fight.

    If you think that's a winner, then you sir, are a loser :yep
     
  4. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004
    its boxing both fighters got DIRTY hopkins lose the fight more than joe won it hops just stoped tossing punches
     
  5. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    **** off crybaby

    Calzaghe won the fight because he stopped Hopkins form doing his thing.

    Hopkins tried to stop Calzaghe from doing his thing by using every dirty trick in the book and it didn't work, so he was reduced to acting in the 10th round.

    Hopkins is a ***** and so are you.
     
  6. at1

    at1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,540
    15
    Sep 26, 2004

    relax man just a msg board really calm down we are men here point is joe didn't do much neither did hopkins fight was close
     
  7. greengloves

    greengloves Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,421
    0
    Dec 2, 2007
    do you really think hopkins won round 4,i had that the clearest round of the first half of the fight outside round 1.
     
  8. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    Calzaghe tried to win the fight.

    Hopkins tried to do enough to have grounds to complain in case he didn't get the decision.

    I have no problem whatsoever with this outcome.
     
  9. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    No I think you're basically completely wrong dude. Go away.
     
  10. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    just as hopkins made the fight hard for joe, so its vica versa and jow made the fight hard for hopkins.

    despite the rhetoric about hopkins handling southpaws easy , calzaghe made it virtulally impossible for hopkins to land with his jab.

    hopkins landed 11 jabs over the whole 12 rounds of the fight.
     
  11. Ziggy Montana

    Ziggy Montana The Butcher Full Member

    3,605
    0
    Oct 3, 2007
    Serious clinching certainly instilled that impression.
     
  12. mattress

    mattress Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,030
    2
    Apr 8, 2007
    Calzaghe walked it. All the old man did was hold, backpeddle, butt and throw the odd punch. How the hell do you win a fight with that? Rounds 1 and 2, yes he won easy but what else?

    He should admit defeat and get over it. The same should be said of his fanboys too.
     
  13. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    So, whats the deal with you now now that TR dropped you.

    Foreman is going to get a title shot and you havent done anything since that fight.
     
  14. Beebs

    Beebs Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,226
    5
    Feb 21, 2007
    The very definition of a delusional nuthugger.
     
  15. housecat

    housecat Member Full Member

    174
    1
    Mar 28, 2008
    Even in a LOSS hopkins = HEAD BUTS