Even though we know Khan is better then Prescott.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Samurai's Slice, Sep 9, 2011.


  1. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    If Prescott beats McCloskey like Khan did we need a rematch. It isn't about Khan being a better fighter then Prescott. Because we all know he is. It is about honor. Prescott whooped him around the ring for 1 minute and then finished him. I know now that Roach trains him and he bet Zab Judah ect. he is above Prescott's level. But that is his only loss. I have a quote, A fight isn't an upset until it is avenged. Just as I said with Tyson-Douglas ( Yes, I am bringing this up ) but to proof that he has honor, he needs to rematch him if he wins tommarow. Proof that Prescott just has a " Punchers Chance ". I will loose more respect for him if he doesn't ( Same as I do since he won't rematch Maidana either. Hell, you could have had Maidana winning! It was close. Barrera-Morales hated eachother. But when they got a close first fight. Number 2 happened. And then #3. My Point being rematch Prescott for honor and rematch Maidana too. Don't fight Peterson or Morales, Fight someone who deserves the fight or is ready. Such as Prescott and Maidana.
     
  2. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    I agree, except I think you're sleeping on Peterson.
     
  3. big_AL

    big_AL P4P #1 Full Member

    2,410
    59
    Jul 22, 2010
    i agree.it would make great money in britain aswell

    but btw,it would be very difficult to give maidana the fight and i think khan would beat him even more convincingly next time and i feel it is unfair to criticize khan for not making the rematch,especially as maidana is in a bit of a rematch scandal himself with el terrible
     
  4. oibighead

    oibighead G.O.A.T. Full Member

    12,724
    4
    Jan 1, 2010
    prescott deserves a rematch if he beats mcloskey

    maidana lost fair and square... he is a step backwards regardless what he does now
     
  5. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    khan had just turned 23 years old when he had the war with maidena....now hes beaten a still dangerous zab...tried to fight bradley.....but you guys harp on him for not rematching....hes 24 years old....has unified the titles among his 6 world title fights..... you guys either think a guy like Povetkin, a gold medalist from the same olympics (2004) who is 32 years old...hasnt fought ****...and its a smart business move to not fight wlad....as he needs more expierence...but khan...8 years younger, 6 more title fights and he gets his balls busted for not rematching the toughest fight of his career.... felix sturm fights bum after bum ....but lets bash khan for not rematching a life and death fight within the first year....
    the double standard is unreal when it comes to khan
     
  6. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    i dont see what the hype is on him...hes world class...but hes not in the same league as khan.....he was shut out by bradley...which is no shame....but he its easy to look good vs inferior guys but when you get shut out by guys in the same league as you....doesnt worry me too much if im khan
     
  7. Vidic

    Vidic Rest in Peace Manny Full Member

    13,207
    11
    Nov 23, 2010
    I beleive Khan will wipe the floor with him but since Prescott has beaten him and talked trash about him and his father, I will not begrudge him taking a fight I see to be extremely one-sided.