everytime i watch this i think oscar won!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rochsolloch, Apr 5, 2008.


  1. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    i for one would never diss on any ex-pro boxer record because me personally i can never be a boxer. i can only imagine the anxiety of going into a fight against another pro fighter. and by the way 10 win 4 loss record is respectable.
     
  2. rochsolloch

    rochsolloch stephen chinnock Full Member

    1,536
    1
    Oct 7, 2006

    cheers for the respect benny good man bro!
     
  3. BENNY BLANCO

    BENNY BLANCO R.I.P. Brooklyn1550 Full Member

    10,718
    9
    Mar 8, 2008
    i felt oscar won 4 rounds and if i want to be generous i can give him the 12th round based off the fact that he had the better of the exchane in the last 30 seconds of the fight but then again that would be dumb on my part.
     
  4. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Floyd clearly won this fight. One judge did score it for Oscar 7-5. However, his card is suspect. He scored the 10th for Hoya. In that round Hoya was outlanded 20-7 and Oscar didn't even have one of his customary flurries. Round 10 was the most lopsided round of the fight at that point. Kaczmarek also scored round 12 for Hoya. Oscar was outlanded 23-12 in that round and really didn't do anything until the last minute.
     
  5. rochsolloch

    rochsolloch stephen chinnock Full Member

    1,536
    1
    Oct 7, 2006
    there is 1 thing thats an absoloute certainty any fighter who dont have a great jab stands no chance against floyd,zab judah did very well in the first 4 rounds,if he could have maintained that level all fight he would have won imo.

    if oscar has a rematch and i was freddie roach id hammer it home again and again "double the jab up because it stops floyd counterpunching,thats the key"also if you notice when floyds back is to the ropes he tends to bend to his left mostly and as the fighter is coming in floyd turns the right glove almost like hes showing the palm of his hand with his left under his chin,oscar
    charged in a lot in those moments in the 1st fight ,what i think he should do is act as though hes gonna do the same but quickly at the last second throw a big uppercut to the body instead of swinging and missing because floyds ducked,if you throw the uppercut your at least gauranteed to make contact with the body or head.
     
  6. truewarrior

    truewarrior Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,284
    0
    Feb 3, 2008
    Truth is nobody won this fight. It was a display of the worst fight that money can buy. Nobody came to fight or ruin their reputation by getting cought with a devastating punch. Both men really didnt want to go to war more so PBF with his defensive jogging. I bet Oscar would have loved a brawl in fact by the looks of it he was trying to start it.
     
  7. truewarrior

    truewarrior Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,284
    0
    Feb 3, 2008
    I agree I think PBF can be predictable at times and the best way to time him is when he ducks.
     
  8. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    I still think Oscar might have a better chance the second time around. I feel that Oscar really needs to prove himself and he is not going to lay down. Floyd could be so impressed with himself as the so called entertainer, that he could come in unfocused. I respect both of their abilities and look forward to the rematch. Cotto could diffinitely be the next opponent especially if Oscar wins and then later the big rubber match with Floyd. Again, if Floyd comes in unfocused we could be watching a different scenario on who will be fighting who. Oscar is not going out with a loss. He will knock out Forbes, fight Floyd, and one more. I believe he has more money then even his grand kids can spend. HE WANTS TO WIN.
     
  9. surreal deal

    surreal deal Liverpool via Krypton Full Member

    7,396
    410
    Jun 16, 2006
    Well?At least he's actually MET Hopkins.
     
  10. Outboxer

    Outboxer Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    5
    Mar 29, 2005
    DLH lost for two main reasons:

    1) He stopped using his jab down the stretch.

    And even more importantly,

    2) He gassed out down the stretch, as usual.

    The second point is something that Mayweather knew would happen -- in fact, he says it at the end of one of the 24/7 episodes in the buildup to the fight, something like 'we know he gets tired'. He was counting on DLH gassing out in the later rounds, and it worked perfectly. DLH only has himself to blame.
     
  11. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    It's all about punches landed, not how aggressive a guy looks.

    You can be sure that if the judges didn't give it to Oscar, he didn't win the fight.
     
  12. eliqueiros

    eliqueiros Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,344
    7
    Oct 25, 2007
    Without Oscar pressing the fight there would have been no fight.
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I didn't mean to demeen your achievements but 'Making it as a Pro' implys you won titles at a high level. Now if your going to come on here and say 'my opinion counts more because I've made it as a Pro' your going to get called on it and even if you had made it as a pro it wouldnt necessarily mean your right, plenty of world champions talk a load of **** and get many things wrong. Especially when you only watch highlights, I could patch together a fight you won to show highlights that made it look like your opponent won

    You sounded happy to see Derry Matthews stopped, bit of bad blood there? :lol:
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch:patsch
     
  15. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    t'was a close fight, similar to Pac-JMM, that could have gone either way and still not be considered robbery.