EVIDENCE that Top Rank offered a Dirty Test Penalty Fee

Who gives a **** what Roach said? Last I checked, he was just the trainer. Since when does he make decisions for Pac?

 

Nothing wrong with that.

I really don't think that drug testing is the main issue or even a real issue here (even though it's at the absolute forefront of the media coverage), it could really be that everyone involved thought that they could let the anticipation build a lot by letting the fight simmer for a bit and having both fighters compete in "showcase, but possibly dangerous fights", rather than having this mega-event so quickly and early on in the year.

I imagine that everyone will profit even more in September than in March. In the meantime, even though a lot of people think that this fight sells itself, Arum and Schafer won't be content with that and will continue this crap until the fight is really signed (hell, the fight could actually secretly be signed for September for all we know).

 

Of course they are. If they surface I agree 100 percent. However, as of now there is absolutely no proof and this definitely isnt proof in the slightest. Its some idiot Floyd fan (and Im no *******, in fact I hate both *******s and Floyd nuthuggers) who is trying to twist and turn something into something its not.

Everyone knows what happens if you test dirty. Nowhere in this email does it say the fine will be paid but no suspension. Of course he would be suspended if he tested dirty. Theres no way around that. This monetary penalty would be on top of the suspension.

Do you really think the NSAC would allow a monetary penalty with no suspension for someone testing dirty? Youd have to be a ****ing idiot to believe that.