EVIDENCE that Top Rank offered a Dirty Test Penalty Fee

and yet Floyd refused it....:think

 

common sense dude, why would pacman pay 10 Million to fight and just get overturned after the fight? that will leave him nothing.

 

You are really stretching it for the TS. Any test they take, if one is found guilty, would mean the fight is of. The rule on PED is clear. Your license will be revoked. There will be no fight. But a binding contract between the two fighter on the result would still pay of the guy that is clean.

 

Exactly, which goes with my point. The stipulation wasn't doing **** because it was under the Regular Nevada Testing. Mayweather probably thought Manny could cheat and get off not paying since he doesn't think the Nevada Testing is adequate. Mosley never tested positive, either. Mayweather is standing by his principles. That adds more guilt to Pac and not Floyd.

Why can't people see that? It's tricky move.

 

i guess, it was just an attempt by arum and team pac to get the random blood testing off the table, which everyone knew they wanted off the table all along, so the article really brings nothing new to light

 

Dumbass thread. This **** shot be banned.

 

mayweather's personal agenda for the win!

 

right, but if the testing isnt to the level mayweather wanted aka no random blood, he would have no reason to accept, meaning the article is irrelevant and doesnt prove anything either way

 

Where do you get you're information from?

1) Any test? Based on what?

2) Fight would be off? Then what's the point of the stipulation...

So they could ruin a fight because someone is on steroids. And the riod user would still have to pay the other guy 10 million dollars? I'd decline that too, ESPECIALLY since it's obvious that this would be under the Nevada Testing. Smoke and mirrors, Pac has proven he can pass their test. Mosley never tested positive either.

 

yes he did, hes not asking for testing for monetary gain, hes asking for testing to insure manny is clean, a 10mil penalty doesnt do anything for anyone wanting a clean fight if the testing in inadequate

 

exactly the point it got rejected.

 

SO HE SHOULD BE BANNED CUZ U DONT AGREE WITH WHAT HE SAID? UR A JOKE OF A POSTERhat

 

I'm not the TS. I'm responding to the crazy spin that they got from this.

 

This is one of the most ironic posts I have ever read from a *******...

Sad thing is tards dont see that this is along the lines of asking. Look if you were going to ask you would have to know what they would be willing to take.

Its odd how *******s change thier stance on things. When the news first broke of the email *******s were saying "OH it what lawyers do, they are coving all bases" Which of course is bull****. Secondly to me it appears that they were tring to throw the money out there instead of taking the test. Which of course we know by the Mosley Example wont be caught by the **** tests.

This isnt a smoking gun but its more fuel to the fire:good

 

Any test meaning NSAC or USADA. If either fighter test positive they will get their license revoked. That is the NSAC rule.

The point of the stipulation is the guy that is clean would get paid. Any test that they agree on be it NVSAC or USADA should come with a hefty monetary penalty.

As for Mosley it was EPO. The EPO he was using wasn't even know or being tested by NSAC.