Excuses when Pac beats Soto

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008.


Page 1 of 7
  1. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    1. Soto has already been beaten by Guzman and pac beating him does not mean much.


    2. Pac just loves to fight guys coming from a loss. he fought eric coming off a loss thrice, mab, larios. So he clearly cherry picked soto, therfore, winning against him ain't worth nothing

    3. Soto is stepping up in weight. so pac beating him won't mean ****.


    so please, make Pac-Valero or better yet Pac-campbell. please. pretty pretty please
     
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    #1
  2. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    So how much credit do you think pac should received for beating Soto? To mean it's a good fight for pac while the lightweight division sorts itself out.
     
    reed_man02, Jul 13, 2008
    reed_man02, Jul 13, 2008
    #2
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    its true that Guzman already beat Soto

    and its also true that Soto is pretty small for a lightweight.




    :lol: according to boxrec Soto is actually set to fight Barrera can you believe that ****! I will pray to god that Barrera beats Soto and if it happens i will become a jew, a christian, and a muslim all at the same time GO BARRERA
     
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    #3
  4. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    this fight does not make sense for pac. if he wants a stay busy fight. fight valero. not soto. valero offers higher reward for lower risk. and you get to stain his pretty little record.
     
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    #4
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pac just had a stay busy or tuneup fight. If he's gonna have another one then it should be in september, when all the other fighters in the division are also fighting, not in November, when it kind of ruins the timing for other more important bouts in the lightweight division.
     
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    PH|LLA, Jul 13, 2008
    #5
  6. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008
    Because damn Nevada Commission is taking so long to process Valero's medical finding. Heck Soto is low risk no reward. I prefer Valero against him anyday.
     
    Nestea, Jul 13, 2008
    Nestea, Jul 13, 2008
    #6
  7. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007
    i'll be happy if pac blasts soto's ass into oblivion to shup up people claiming soto will be a difficult fight for pac

    pac valero is still a better matchup for me too, but if they cannot make the fight soto would be okay
     
    jupzrooni, Jul 13, 2008
    jupzrooni, Jul 13, 2008
    #7
  8. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    I would be impressed. I think Soto poses some stylistic problems for pac. Like I said, should be a good fight, whereas the pac diaz fight was total **** and didnt even watch. I will be looking forward to this fight.:deal
     
    reed_man02, Jul 13, 2008
    reed_man02, Jul 13, 2008
    #8
  9. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    so you think the excuses i mentioned above won't be stated if and when pac beats soto?
     
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    #9
  10. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Great™ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    4. Humberto Soto has 7 losses in his record and he hasn't won any major titles (from Bantamweight - Super Featherweight)
     
    hellblazer, Jul 13, 2008
    hellblazer, Jul 13, 2008
    #10
  11. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    Well aside from the opinion at the end of each point, what you stated were facts, so I can see people bringing those points up. However, that still shouldnt take away from the fact that Soto is a good fighter and even though he isnt proven at lightweight, Manny just moved up himself and the fight being at lightweight shouldn't mean much.
     
    reed_man02, Jul 13, 2008
    reed_man02, Jul 13, 2008
    #11
  12. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    Whats with Bob Arum? I hope this fight will not push through. I don't like this fight at all as a Pac victory means nothing.. Why would Pac fight a Guzman leftover?.. Bring in Valero please or someone.
     
    angelos, Jul 13, 2008
    angelos, Jul 13, 2008
    #12
  13. jupzrooni

    jupzrooni Tyler Durden Full Member

    3,034
    2
    Nov 17, 2007
    :deal
     
    jupzrooni, Jul 13, 2008
    jupzrooni, Jul 13, 2008
    #13
  14. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    it's all business for arum. that's why he made soto fight bobpac in the first place. he promotes both soto and pac afaik and that means he gets to keep a bigger peice of the pie compared with having valero
     
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    theunderdog, Jul 13, 2008
    #14
  15. chino2dapiapimp

    chino2dapiapimp WBC Fecarbox champ Full Member

    1,814
    86
    Jun 30, 2008
    The question should be "If pac loses what will pacamaniacs use as an excuse?" I remember the **** load of excuses when he last lost :)
     
    chino2dapiapimp, Jul 13, 2008
    chino2dapiapimp, Jul 13, 2008
    #15
Page 1 of 7