Expect mayweather to go on full "Quack Mode" after the Broner beat down.

Only Broner didn't get "Beat Down". Or worn down., And Broner is not Mayweather.

 

if you think broner's loss somehow laid the blueprint on how to beat floyd i think you are absolutely CRAZY

 

Yet Mayweather beat Castillo 2x. For some reason he didn't do it the second time? :smh

 

I love how people use a fight from 2001, where Mayweather was injured, as a reference to beating Mayweateher in 2013-2014. Besides the obvious fact the man is no longer injured, he is also a better fighter than he was. Floyd's inside game is leaps and bounds better than it was.

Why don't we just pull up tape from Pacquiao's loss in 1999 as a "blueprint" for beating Manny? That's how stupid you guys are. LOL As if the Manny Pacquiao of 1999 has any relevance to the Pacquiao today.

Better yet: We should pull out the Margarito vs Martinez fight at 154 pounds in 2000 and watch it. Clearly Margarito had the blue print to beating Martinez today in 2013-2014......

 

he already did.

pac can have his belt.

 

Apart from persona and boxing style, Broner is nowhere near Mayweather in terms of skill and boxing ability.

For starters, he could take a lesson or two in ring generalship and footwork, which was non-existent in Maidana fight.

 

If what Maidana did on Broner, cracking his soft shell with overhand punches all night long was so easy to do to Mayweather, don't you think that one of the trainers of Mayweather's former opponents would have already tried this tactic? There are smart and bright trainers all over boxing, watching boxing tapes all day and night, game planning and preparing their fighter rigorously to fight Mayweather, but none of them have been able to guide their fighters to victory over Mayweather. People on boxingforum24 act like they know more than the boxer trainers who have lost to Mayweather when few of us do.

 

we can also "tale" that, judging by the spelling and grammar in your post, you are a dumbass.

 

its like Paulie Malignaggi always says, how long are people going to talk about the JLC fight? It was his very 1st fight at a new weight and more importantly, it was 100 years ago. You guys truly think Mayweather hasnt improved? You think because something happened when he was 24, means you are going to still do that to him? That was literally half a lifetime ago and people still bring it up like this is the blue print. Its stupid

 

He's been in quack mode forever, what's new. He's on record claiming himself to be a "rich coward". His best friend had to reluctantly agree he did duck Pacquiao. Floyd understands the fight game much better than these *****s, he knows danger when he sees it.

What's new?