Exposing Floyd finally

its like another way of saying he came 2nd in a two horse race.

 

lol

 

I am not going to talk seriously with you anymore you have proved you have no boxing knowledge whatsoever

azzer"Judah is better than clottey"

ROFL he says that because he didn't even know clottey fought Judah go home sonny:hi:

 

He has no boxing knowledge because he didn't know a fighter fought another fighter? OK then.

 

azzer"judah is better than clottey"

ROFL if I was you I would log of I just owned you go watch the clottey vs Judah fight

 

At least if you are going to come at someone get you're facts straight that's my point I can never talk boxing with him again on a serious level after that comment it was pathetic.

 

Maybe i didn't mention Judah because.....well just about everyone has beat Judah.....oh except Pacqiauo.

and in the grand scheme of things, Judah will be more fondly.remembered than Clottey ever will.

 

Either man losing is not exposing them. No shame at all in losing to Pacquiao or Floyd.

 

And Floyd wasn't prime when he fought Oscar, Cotto, or Maidana lol

 

I still don't see why that "proves" he has no knowledge of boxing. It's not like people can remember all of a fighter's opponents.

 

I don't have anyone on ignore... Sadly lol

 

You're pathetic I just owned you and you are trying to save face just log of man

"Judah is better than clottey" the people who would make this comment is people who don't know **** about boxing

 

He only knows about Clottey because Pacquiao fought him, seriously.

 

I like how he didn't really answer my question. Having a close fight with Margarito isn't the same as winning.

So, his best win is Judah?

 

Its not the case of him not remembering it.

it was the way he was coming at me without having any sort of knowledge on the topic he was trying to argue,I exposed him for having no boxing knowledge and now he feels ****.

Like I told him I only talk seriously with people who I can see have boxing knowledge what's the point in debating with a layman?