Extremely Biased Judges For The Pavlik/Taylor Fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Farmboxer, Sep 30, 2007.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    I am so tired of the damned biased judges. If Pavlik had not knocked Taylor out the criminal judges would have given the fight to Taylor, ESPN's score card was a shame, the fix was in with the damned judges as I thought. All Taylor has to do is run like Hell and be standing to get a decision which is one reason I watch less boxing than I used to. The extreme hatred of Euro boxers is a disgrace and is so obvious. Emanuel Steward was threatened when it was a announced that he was to train Vladimir Klitschko, he was also called a traitor! Why was that? The drugging of Vlad was a sick disgrace, along with the damned coverup by the US boxing media. So, Maskaev is hated because he is Euro, although he is an American citizen, Sam is not, yet he is the America hero, such a disgrace. Sam to fight McCline? Why? He is not even rated. He should have to fight Valouev instead, since Valouev is ranked, he beat McCline, just a set-up by Don King and his fellow criminals. Plus, so many good fights are boycotted by USTV, instead we get some really sick fights. No wonder boxing is on the downside.
     
    Farmboxer, Sep 30, 2007
    Farmboxer, Sep 30, 2007
    #1
  2. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Boxing is not on the downside...take a look at the next 4 months
     
    brooklyn1550, Sep 30, 2007
    brooklyn1550, Sep 30, 2007
    #2
  3. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Whoever had it 59-54 should be immediately banned and have their judging credentials revoked. 58-55 is an absolute travesty, but 59-54?!! Are you *bleeping* kidding me?

    EFF you, HBO and DiBella. Thank God the Ghost brought the hammer down on "Bullspit decisions" Taylor. NO MORE garbage decision 'victories' for the fraudulent one.
     
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2007
    paulfv, Sep 30, 2007
    #3
  4. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yep.
     
    Farmboxer, Sep 30, 2007
    Farmboxer, Sep 30, 2007
    #4
  5. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007
    Perhaps it was biased to give Taylor the fight by such a wide margin, but only a blind hater can honestly say that it would have been a robbery if Taylor were to have gotten a decision.
     
    RAMPAGE0017, Sep 30, 2007
    RAMPAGE0017, Sep 30, 2007
    #5
  6. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    that wide margin was really aimed for another robbery... tho i had it +2 for JT
     
    boxbox, Sep 30, 2007
    boxbox, Sep 30, 2007
    #6
  7. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pavlik would have outpointed Taylor anyway, but the judges would never have given him a decision, no matter what. Harold Ledderman had Pavlik winning the fight and he hates Euro fighters. Judges need to be suspended or kicked out.

    Winky deserved a the decision over Taylor and so did Hopkins, not to take anything away from Pavlik who proved his balls!
     
    Farmboxer, Sep 30, 2007
    Farmboxer, Sep 30, 2007
    #7
  8. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007



    ..Pavlik is American, dude....
     
    RAMPAGE0017, Sep 30, 2007
    RAMPAGE0017, Sep 30, 2007
    #8
  9. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    Go to sleep....:-(
     
    sues2nd, Sep 30, 2007
    sues2nd, Sep 30, 2007
    #9
  10. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,331
    634
    Jun 16, 2006

    Well said.
     
    rodney, Sep 30, 2007
    rodney, Sep 30, 2007
    #10
  11. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Good point about the knockdown. It looked like Kelly dropped his hands as if to say "bring it." Then he was caught against and dropped to the canvas.

    If there is one thing Kelly needs to do, it's work on his defense - moving his head so he's not such an easy, straight-up target.
     
    brooklyn1550, Sep 30, 2007
    brooklyn1550, Sep 30, 2007
    #11
  12. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,115
    Apr 16, 2005
    HBO, the gift that keeps on giving - to Taylor. :nod :fire

    And would have AGAIN if it were not for Pavlik taking it out of their control! :nod
     
    Zakman, Sep 30, 2007
    Zakman, Sep 30, 2007
    #12
  13. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
    I agree but it was a very close fight and yes Valuev would be way more interesting to me as well
     
    maracho, Sep 30, 2007
    maracho, Sep 30, 2007
    #13
  14. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    I had it 58-56 for JT, as the 1st and 4th rounds were close but I though he edged them out, pavlik dominated the 3rd and 5th rounds though. None of it matters because Pavlik got KO.
     
    TheGreat, Oct 1, 2007
    TheGreat, Oct 1, 2007
    #14
  15. iceman

    iceman Tis my Island Full Member

    4,899
    0
    Jul 4, 2006
    I think a major problem with the scoring system is that judges do not score enough drawn rounds.Taylor was scoring better early but Pavlik was the agressor and there were some very close rounds.
    Taylor won the 2nd 10-8 and Pavlik won the 3rd and the other rounds were almost too close to call.Are judges told to avoid scoring a round 10 - 10 ?
     
    iceman, Oct 1, 2007
    iceman, Oct 1, 2007
    #15
Page 1 of 2