Ezzard Charles of Louis fight vs Ali/ winner?

Ali by dec or late tko.

 

Ali by clear decision. That combination of mobility, reach, speed and endurance would have been too much for Ezz to overcome. Walcott shared the ring with both (Ali when he refereed Liston II), when they were at their peaks, knew each of them well (along with Louis and Marciano), and Jersey Joe was the foremost exponent of the opinion Muhammad would indeed have beaten all the other great heavyweights among the other champions in the division. (Walcott and Louis had a public debate over this issue after Manila, the Bomber disagreeing with Walcott's assessment.)

Ezz could have some success replicating the approach Folley took in 1967, but it would ultimately be too much of a task to successfully complete. I do think Charles had sufficient skills and toughness to remain upright to the final bell.

 

which ali? the ali who laboured against jones would have lost on points to charles who beat Louis. The ali who aced foley would outpoint charles though. The ali who spinks and norton beat would lose to charles also. The ali who beat quarry would stop charles.
and by the way, there is no diference between the louis charles and the rocky charles.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RrF-aCcdvDM[/ame]

This is the charles rocky fought. this is no shopworn former champ, this is a razor sharp former champ hungry for his title back! in great form!

 

Agreed.

 

ali ud

 

As much as I'd like to formulate a plan for Charles to win, you have to think that Alis size advantage, his phenomenal speed and own ability to evade/absorb Charles' bombs/nullify his jab point to Ali's head attack getting Charles out of there late.

 

Don't know why everybody makes such a big deal out of the Jones fight.

 

Ezzard was a great fighter, and probably one of boxing's pound for pound best, but when it came to greatness at heavyweight, he was out of Ali's league. This is probably a mismatch..

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Nor the Louis of Schmeling 2, and the Louis of Marciano

 

charles never looked beter on film than against satterfield and wallace. Now, I know nobody wants to hear that- but tell me where he looked more impresive? he fought marciano after those fights. sure in the actual fight he didnt look as effective since marciano bore him down but the proof that charles's a-game was there in the early rounds until marcianos power took its toll.

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4E2BEE8Ce70[/ame]


hmmmm, Isnt it odd that the guy who put this together chose to use this footage of charles to demonstrate his class rather than other fights?