Ezzard Charles v.s Frank Bruno

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bad_Intentions, Jul 10, 2007.



Page 4 of 4
  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    12,455
    8,326
    Sep 21, 2017
    Charles was closer to 185 pounds at heavyweight. Not 180.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Jul 15, 2020
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Jul 15, 2020
    #46
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    75,780
    15,837
    Sep 15, 2009
    I have a soft spot for Bruno and I rarely troll so when I have an opportunity I can't help it lol.

    But yeah I am having a laugh mate, no hard feelings.
     
    lufcrazy, Jul 15, 2020
    lufcrazy, Jul 15, 2020
    #47
    LoadedGlove likes this.
  3. LoadedGlove

    LoadedGlove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,529
    4,264
    Dec 6, 2019
    Nice work Luf. Fair play.
     
    LoadedGlove, Jul 15, 2020
    LoadedGlove, Jul 15, 2020
    #48
    lufcrazy likes this.
  4. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,231
    1,642
    Sep 5, 2016
    Bruno.hit very hard and his jab was a weapon not a point scorer.if he lands Ezzard is in big trouble . Frank early Ezzard late!
     
    lloydturnip, Jul 15, 2020
    lloydturnip, Jul 15, 2020
    #49
  5. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,141
    5,004
    Oct 22, 2015
    Ezzard was way too good to lose to Frank Bruno. Size difference means nothing when the skill gap is this large. Ezzard was plenty big enough to deal with a musclebound journeyman like Bruno
     
    Richmondpete, Jul 15, 2020
    Richmondpete, Jul 15, 2020
    #50
Page 4 of 4