Ezzard Charles v.s Frank Bruno

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bad_Intentions, Jul 10, 2007.

Page 4 of 4
  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    16,020
    Likes Received:
    11,529
    Charles was closer to 185 pounds at heavyweight. Not 180.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Jul 15, 2020
    #46
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    80,662
    Likes Received:
    21,272
    I have a soft spot for Bruno and I rarely troll so when I have an opportunity I can't help it lol.

    But yeah I am having a laugh mate, no hard feelings.
     
    lufcrazy, Jul 15, 2020
    #47
    LoadedGlove likes this.
  3. LoadedGlove

    LoadedGlove Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2019
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    4,283
    Nice work Luf. Fair play.
     
    LoadedGlove, Jul 15, 2020
    #48
    lufcrazy likes this.
  4. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2016
    Messages:
    2,231
    Likes Received:
    1,654
    Bruno.hit very hard and his jab was a weapon not a point scorer.if he lands Ezzard is in big trouble . Frank early Ezzard late!
     
    lloydturnip, Jul 15, 2020
    #49
  5. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    7,140
    Likes Received:
    5,026
    Ezzard was way too good to lose to Frank Bruno. Size difference means nothing when the skill gap is this large. Ezzard was plenty big enough to deal with a musclebound journeyman like Bruno
     
    Richmondpete, Jul 15, 2020
    #50
Page 4 of 4