Ezzard Charles v.s Frank Bruno

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bad_Intentions, Jul 10, 2007.

  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta We Do Chicken Right!! Full Member

    9,919
    5,987
    Sep 21, 2017
    Charles was closer to 185 pounds at heavyweight. Not 180.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    69,290
    9,742
    Sep 15, 2009
    I have a soft spot for Bruno and I rarely troll so when I have an opportunity I can't help it lol.

    But yeah I am having a laugh mate, no hard feelings.
     
    LoadedGlove likes this.
  3. LoadedGlove

    LoadedGlove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,632
    3,044
    Dec 6, 2019
    Nice work Luf. Fair play.
     
    lufcrazy likes this.
  4. lloydturnip

    lloydturnip Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,232
    1,620
    Sep 5, 2016
    Bruno.hit very hard and his jab was a weapon not a point scorer.if he lands Ezzard is in big trouble . Frank early Ezzard late!
     
  5. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    6,608
    4,328
    Oct 22, 2015
    Ezzard was way too good to lose to Frank Bruno. Size difference means nothing when the skill gap is this large. Ezzard was plenty big enough to deal with a musclebound journeyman like Bruno