ezzard charles vs. archie moore

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by di tullio, Mar 25, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,214
    48,497
    Mar 21, 2007
    Calzaghe would rule all those guys
     
    ikrasevic likes this.
  2. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,933
    Feb 21, 2009
    If Charles is hurt in that picture, Moore is certainly hurt much worse! Great picture! Thanks for posting it! It brought back memories!!!
     
  3. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Charles was never really liked by the press back in his day.

    A friend of Ezzard told me in the first fight that Moore said to Charles "They might think you're something back in Ohio, but out here you're just another n155er."

    Great picture.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  4. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Same here. Add Eddie Booker, Jack Chase, and Cocoa Kid to that list. The row is unparalled in my book. Truly complete fighters who ducked no one.

    I am saddened they all didn't come 20 years later myself. Where we could have a better look at their respective carrers.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    All those fighters started boxing in the pre-ww2 period, most came up from the depths of the Great Depression or thereabouts. Bivins and Charles started pro in 1940, the others were starting out in the 1930s.
    Louis "Cocoa Kid" Hardwick was a pro as early as 1929 or 1930, and Archie Moore started in 1930 too (according to Henry Armstrong).

    Archie Moore was probably past his best when he became champion, but still hungry, and the opposition wasn't as stong in the 1950s as it had been 10 or 20 years earlier.

    the pre-ww2 era was the best.
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,558
    9,560
    Jul 15, 2008
    Moore was definately past his best as champ but like Hopkins was a physial marvel who managed to keep a large portion of his physical skills and retain the discipline and focus needed to make up the slack .. Moore was an amazing fighter ...
     
  7. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,336
    10,832
    Jul 28, 2009
    :lol:
     
  8. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,718
    3,826
    Oct 30, 2011
    Still no footage or new pictures from any of these fights? I've searched everywhere and found nothing. Ezzard Charles probably had the most fascinating style I've ever seen on film, from 1946-1951 he was probably the greatest fighter who ever lived. Was slick as they come with a mean streak.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta and TipNom like this.
  9. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,485
    11,935
    Sep 21, 2017
    If I came across the video I would only let @mcvey and @Seamus view it
     
  10. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,605
    27,153
    Jun 26, 2009
    Both were indeed physical marvels with the constitutions of a team oxen, but without that supreme discipline they’d have been a couple of old men instead of a couple of reigning champs as old men.

    They’re testaments to what dedication can do.