Ezzard Charles vs Holyfield

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by BUDW, May 31, 2009.


  1. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,927
    824
    Nov 23, 2007
    I think Charles wins a spirted close fight by decision
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,041
    25,110
    Jan 3, 2007

    At What stage of their careers?
     
  3. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,927
    824
    Nov 23, 2007
    both in their prime.
     
  4. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Charles prime was at 175.
     
  5. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,927
    824
    Nov 23, 2007
    he was about 190 when he won fighter of the year two years runing 49 and 50
     
  6. albinored

    albinored Active Member Full Member

    1,007
    16
    Oct 7, 2007
    ....before steroids, ezzard. after steroids...who can say.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,722
    29,070
    Jun 2, 2006
    at heavyweight i go for evander
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,250
    Feb 6, 2009
    has as been mentioned ,charles's prime was at 175lb.
    at under 190 ezzard wins,a no steroid rule would still see ezzard as the victor !!
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    I want to take Ezzard, and i think he can win it, but this 'in their prime' rule is throwing me off, Holyfield is the bigger man at their absolute respective best. Ezzard likes to fire them rapid shots, and also at timrs likes to jump in with such, he may be met by a composed, confident and strong Holyfield who has speed in his fists to boot, and will push the action. Holyfield for me.

    In their respective best heavyweight form i think Ezzard has a much better chance, although Holyfield is not too far removed from his best here, we are not handicapping Charles in the format of being the smaller man. Charles can fight going backwards, and was effective against the best heavies of his era. I'll pick Charles in that scenario to even it out, plus i'm more fond of him.
     
  10. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,046
    Oct 25, 2006
    I think to be fair to Ezzard we should match heavyweight Ezzard with cruiserweight Holyfield.
    That makes for a very intriguing matchup, imo.

    Holyfield at between 208 and 215 would be simply too tall an order for Charles.
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yeah maybe right mate, any idea what Ezzard was weighing at his heavyweight best?
     
  12. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,046
    Oct 25, 2006
    About 182 or thereabouts, I think.
     
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    He's well inside cruiser then, anyway i'm off, thanks for the info there mate.