Ezzard Charles vs John Henry Lewis?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MrBumboclart, Aug 2, 2012.


  1. MrBumboclart

    MrBumboclart Active Member Full Member

    663
    9
    Feb 17, 2012
  2. MrBumboclart

    MrBumboclart Active Member Full Member

    663
    9
    Feb 17, 2012
  3. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    59
    Jul 15, 2007
    This is a real toughie?!! Next to no footage of Henry Lewis - have some brief sparring footage of him - other than that about 5 secs of him being flattened by prime time Louis so going going solely on resumes etc I'd say It goes 15 and maybe Ez edges him - but then Archie Moore, who admittedly saw the best of Ez rated John Henry Lewis as THE greatest Light Heavy of all time so what would I know - would at least feel like I was allowed to have an opinion if I had at least seen one good fight of Henry Lewis in his prime??
     
    Pedro_El_Chef, mcvey and White Bomber like this.
  4. MrBumboclart

    MrBumboclart Active Member Full Member

    663
    9
    Feb 17, 2012
    Yeah. I don't see any shame in a past-prime, one eyed, light-heavy being flattened by Joe Louis at his very best. Louis was good friends with Lewis and planned to coast for 15 like Robby did against Armstrong but Blackburn convinced him that stringing it out would be more painful for Henry Lewis and he should put him out of his misery quick. Joe did. But out of pity more than anything.
     
  5. Hookie

    Hookie Affeldt... Referee, Judge, and Timekeeper Full Member

    7,054
    376
    Dec 19, 2009
    I don't care how much Archie Moore tried to talk up John Henry Lewis... Ezzard Charles was a much better fighter than Lewis. Charles went 3-0 (1) vs. Moore btw.

    Lewis has a very good resume, but Charles' resume is much better.

    Charles by decisive decision.
     
    mr. magoo and turpinr like this.
  6. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,247
    Feb 6, 2009
    :goodwell put
     
  7. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,883
    8,038
    Jul 17, 2009
    Charles easily. Lewis was good,but Ezzard was a class above.
     
  8. Manassa

    Manassa - banned

    7,766
    85
    Apr 6, 2007
    It's pained me for a while now, how ignored is John Henry Lewis on all-time lists, where he usually features at #80-100; the 'incalculable section' wherein resides Young Corbett III also, as well as Sammy Mandell and Frankie Genaro.

    Lewis was brilliant. 2-1 to Charles in a trilogy.

    Only eight or nine fighters in history can muster up names and numbers that even compare to Ezzard's list - nevertheless, how's this for a surprise - all wins, by the way:

    Yale Okun (x2)
    Fred Lenhart (x2)
    Lou Scozza
    Norman Conrad
    Young Firpo
    Tony Shucco (x2)
    Bob Olin (x3)
    Tiger Jack Fox
    Jock McAvoy
    George Nichols (x2)
    Charley Massera
    Bob Godwin
    Al Gainer (x2)
    Red Burman
    Al Ettore (x2)
    Patsy Perroni
    Johnny Risko
    Elmer Ray
    Jimmy Adamick

    Jim Braddock
    Maxie Rosenbloom (x2)
    Len Harvey


    A great record.
     
    thistle likes this.
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,070
    27,898
    Jun 2, 2006
    There are very, very few men I would give a 50/50 chance with Charles at 175lbs. John Henry, fine champ though he was,is not one of them.
     
  10. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    149
    Jul 30, 2006
    YES I've always thought that too, and I've underlined all the well noted fighters that I'm aware of from your list of his opponents, some truly great top fighters also.

    John Henry Lewis was indeed a Great!
     
  11. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    94
    Jul 20, 2010
     
  12. MrBumboclart

    MrBumboclart Active Member Full Member

    663
    9
    Feb 17, 2012
    Where do you rate him? For me, rating him at LHW, is like rating Ricardo Lopez or Eder Jofre in a P4P list, I always feel like I have them too low.
     
  13. thistle1

    thistle1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,915
    149
    Jul 30, 2006
    if you've read some of my posts before with repect to ratings, I DON'T & I CAN'T...

    there are too many "unknowns" when it comes too Ratings,
    I DO recognize that ratings can give one a good measure and starting point, but they are NEVER absolute...

    I also recognize that there are Elite fighters i.e, Greb, SRR, Joe Gans, Pep, Charles and many, many more (which is the point)... because the difference between Elite & Great is nominal, and the difference between Great and Excellent is also little!

    I prefer to think of fighters at their absolute best, and just simply know that on any given night one COULD beat the other, because they are just that good.

    It is IMPOSSIBLE to Truly Rate fighters, Truly.

    I always say AMONG the Greats, or One of the Best, and JHL certainly was that!
     
    mcnugget1290uh likes this.
  14. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    No one should say Charles was "much better". There's not enough footage of JH Lewis to judge.
    I think his record is outstanding.

    I'd stick my neck out and say Ezzard Charles would probably win at least 1 against him if they fought 2 or 3 times. Because Charles beat everyone when he faced them 2 or 3+ times, at LHW.
     
  15. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    94
    Jul 20, 2010
    This :good

    And I don't put any LH in history in a "class above" Lewis. There may be some who could have beaten him, but never to the point where you'd think JHL was out of his league.