Ezzard Charles vs Mike Tyson. "Primes"

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bonecrusher, Aug 5, 2010.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Couldn't have said it better myself.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,032
    48,148
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think that in a 185-214 division, if this fight were made, I think people in this thread would be waaay less confident in their picks.

    But Tyson is the right pick.
     
  3. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,201
    3,373
    Nov 22, 2012
    One thing i have noticed is when any head 2 head thread is made featuring any of Marcianos opponents, Rockys biggest fans always side with them, whether this a subconcious attempt to boost Marcianos standing i don't know but i do see it as being deluded.
     
  4. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
  5. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    Lol lmao lol
     
  6. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    If you pik eZzard there are 2 options you are a troll or a shi7
     
  7. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
    Holyfield
     
    mcvey likes this.
  8. Nighttrain

    Nighttrain 'BOUT IT 'BOUT IT Full Member

    5,292
    977
    Nov 7, 2011
  9. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Owned :rofl
     
    mcvey likes this.
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,595
    27,268
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that people are a bit too quick to dismiss the chances of former light heavyweights against Tyson, based upon the outcome of the Spinks fight.

    I would expect him to beat any and all of them, but I am sure that some of them would do significantly better than Spinks.
     
    mcvey likes this.
  11. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    It's not just based on the Spinks fight-- it's based on an understanding of their respective strengths and weaknesses, and especially Tyson's considerable stylistic and physical advantages over virtually all smaller fighters.
     
  12. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Tyson wasn't really young (certainly not prime) when they fought and Holyfield had been an actual adult-sized heavyweight for more than 8 years before he fought Tyson...
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,595
    27,268
    Feb 15, 2006
    Which are assumed based on the Spinks fight.
     
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    No, it's based on the totality of Tyson's early career. Anything can happen if he has an off night, but no reason to believe that Tyson at his best has particular problems against someone like Charles, no matter how great of a career Charles had.
     
  15. Paulie walnutz

    Paulie walnutz Active Member Full Member

    506
    8
    May 23, 2015
    Tyson squared up in his career.