Ezzard Charles vs Tony Tubbs

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, May 24, 2025.


Who wins and how

  1. Tubbs KO/TKO

    8.3%
  2. Charles KO/TKO

    16.7%
  3. Tubbs Decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Charles Decision

    75.0%
  5. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,217
    11,689
    Sep 21, 2017
    This doesn't seem like it would be a very entertaining fight, but very tactical. Charles has the skill advantage, but Tubbs is skilled and has a size advantage. Who wins?
     
    Devon likes this.
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,096
    25,215
    Jan 3, 2007
    This would definitely be a tactical boxing match. Two fast handed fighters with great skills but neither having much to hurt the other with. Ezzard was a true warrior who fought many times in a single year and faced literally every style we can think of. Tubbs had great reflexes, good defense and good combos and jabs. He was also the bigger man. But he wasn’t a power puncher or terribly aggressive. I’m going to pick Ezzard Charles to take a decision win here.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  3. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,217
    11,689
    Sep 21, 2017
    I agree with this analysis
     
    mr. magoo likes this.
  4. Devon

    Devon Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,419
    5,610
    Dec 31, 2018
    Charles, educated pressure on the front foot, backing Tubbs up and using the lead hand to set up rights by jabbing up and down and changing the looks and movement of that lead hand.

    Ducking to the side of Tubbs’ jab and throwing lead hooks to close the distance and get into close and mid range where he can shorten them up and throw body shots and combinations, going to the body as Tubbs slips and slides, that’s where Tubbs is outmatched, in mid and close range.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.