F*** Jim Grey and Boxing Politics

So you think Broner beat Paulie more decisively than Cano?

 

What does the Cano fight have to do with your inability to score a fight that doesn't have Cano in it?

Should they not give Broner the title because Cano deserved the win a year ago? You absolute tool you. atsch

 

I gave Paulie more rounds than Broner. What can't you understand about that? Broner wasn't losing no matter what. He's an investment. Paulie was for a short time when they robbed Cano. Cano even dropped him. Get off box rec dimbo.

 

Hence my comment on your scoring inability. You don't even seem to know that they score these fights not just decide if the challenger did enough, so why don't you go where the Lounge went, down the drain and get lost forever. Ppl. are having a boxing conversation here.

 

You gave more rounds to Broner. Thats your opinion. As i said , it means nothing to me.

 

you Dont Know Shite About Boxing... :good

 

Post your scorecard.

 

My credentials speak for themselves in Kirks thread. I dont know who you are. You obviously dont have a lot to say about boxing.

 

if your score cards saw Malignaggi winning then you still Dont know **** About Boxing. I dont give a shite if you are Teddy Atlas

 

Broners desperation to score points towards the end proves he even felt down on the cards.

 

I see no point in arguing at all. One should take the belt decisively from the champ? I think so too, but the fight was just crappy. SRL vs Hagler that was something special regardless the outcome. Broner vs. Malinaggi is just a B- vs. C+ fighter. Who cares about the dicision?

 

Post. Your. Scorecard.

 

If Paulie hit like Lucas he would of put Broner to sleep. Weak shots are still scoring shots and he landed the higher %

 

Your credentials lol! Come back to me when you win the Championship which I did 5 years ago.

 

Whats the point? let showtime fire paulie i am sure he would get a call from hbo in no time imo