fab 4 era overrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PernellSweetPea, May 20, 2013.


  1. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Exactly.
     
  2. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Duran yes, Leonard, Hagler and Hearns no.
     
  3. heavy_hands

    heavy_hands Guest

    duran is overrated and should not have been included in this team, he was the worst of the 4 clearly
     
  4. heavy_hands

    heavy_hands Guest

    this
     
  5. Ljc

    Ljc Member Full Member

    148
    0
    Mar 3, 2013
    You again! :lol: duran was smaller and older than the other 3, don't think it's fair to say he was worse than the other 3 in a p4p sence based on his losses to them.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,136
    42,046
    Feb 11, 2005
    most astute observers would agree he was the best of the four, and the only one of the four who is routinely included in top 10 P4P lists.
     
  7. Ljc

    Ljc Member Full Member

    148
    0
    Mar 3, 2013
    :good
     
  8. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,296
    7,035
    Oct 25, 2006
    Yep. In stark contrast to what we have today.
     
  9. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    63
    Dec 1, 2008
    It is not about undefeated. If those fab 4 were interested in being undefeated we would not have a fab 4. Just the fact they were not undefeated is why we have them. They wanted to win regardless of past losses. Jones and Mayweather did the protection handpicking thing. They are good and deserve credit, but they avoided fights which would have made their legacies as good as Leonard. There are not any fights during the fab 4 era I would really want except maybe Hagler vs. Benitez so that there would be a fab 5. Hagler is the only one who didn't fight Benitez.
     
  10. heavy_hands

    heavy_hands Guest

    me again? Who hell are you? Nobody.... Simple..
    And not. He was the worst of the 4 because he never was proved in his prme at lw against another great lw, doe snot matter if he was smaller, robinson did beat the bigger all time great lamotta.
    Duran is overrated
     
  11. heavy_hands

    heavy_hands Guest

    better ? Based on? His fights against de jesus and buchanan? He never was proved it. He was the worst of the 4
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,136
    42,046
    Feb 11, 2005
    You will not find many who know the sport well that will agree with you. This should cause you to at least take pause.
     
  13. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    212
    Feb 5, 2005

    This post should be required reading in the general forum. :good
     
  14. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012

    I know right!...Great post I love it:yep
     
  15. Skins

    Skins Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,255
    2,667
    Oct 20, 2011
    Boy, you got that right about Duran-DeJesus II. One of my favorite fights to watch. The punches come so fast and furious they are hard to keep up with at times. Not just from Duran either, DeJesus was a top fighter at the time. Every time I watch that fight I am amazed at the skill shown by both fighters (especially Duran of course) Good Post!