Fact: Hopkins KO Tito, Roy UD12 Ruiz for P4P#1 - why Hatton KO Pac isn't good enough?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigBone, Apr 27, 2009.


  1. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    The simple fact you have to argue in this thread (my one and only on this ridiculous subject) is that the P4P title (which of course is not something you get by simply defeating the current holder) was earned by Hopkins back in 2001 and by Roy in 2004 despite neither of them beat the actual P4P Champion for it. That's something they never did in their career, just a note.

    In fact, Hopkins in 2001, rated #10 by The Ring, KOd Tito, rated #2 to gain the P4P Champion status. Roy in 2004, rated #2, beat Ruiz, not rated by The Ring (or by any expert in any top50 P4P list), earned the top spot again.



    The argument by many is that Hatton is not going to be the next P4P Champ no matter if and how he can pull off the upset. So my simple question here: if Hatton, rated as a top5 P4P-er for years, #8 currently by The Ring, knocks out P4P Champ Pacquiao in dramatic fashion (obviously outshining JMM's very close/debated loss vs. the same guy), why isn't it enough to take over that spot, but Hopkins over Tito, Roy over Ruiz was? :think
     
  2. Zaryu

    Zaryu Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,985
    43
    Dec 7, 2007
    Because Floyd is back! :lol:
     
  3. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    At this point when it's just a rumor, and up to the point he puts on another masterful performance vs. an elite fighter, this retired boxer is nowhere near the P4P title, sorry to say that.
     
  4. ninerskeet

    ninerskeet Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Mar 16, 2009
    lol :lol:
     
  5. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    Because there's a guy named Juan Manuel Marquez...who is rated by some as the very best fighter RIGHT NOW.
     
  6. Carnage

    Carnage KingFroch Full Member

    2,502
    0
    Jan 9, 2009
    Because when that happened Hopkins and RJJ had achieved alot more than Hatton had, and were near enough p4p no.1 at the time if I'm not mistaken, Hatton just gets into the Top 10.
     
  7. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    It kinda used to annoy me when hatton kept going on about the mythical p4p title but im coming around now to the fact that if he beats the best fighter in the world-pacman-why cant he have the 'title'.
     
  8. blank

    blank Active Member Full Member

    588
    3
    Dec 4, 2007
    First off, Roy was being labeled P4P #1 way, WAY before he ever fought Ruiz. I got into boxing bigtime in 2001, and it was already a foregone conclusion by the time I got into the game. P4P is all subject to opinion, but there were plenty of people saying Jones was the best back in 2001 and 2002, and he was widely promoted by HBO as the best fighter on their network.


    Hopkins vs Tito, and the hype before it was one of the fights that made me a boxing fan. But really, Hopkins shocked a bunch of people with that win and it greatly elevated his status as a great fighter, but the majority of writers and a bunch of fans didn't make proclaim him as #1 after it. It was debated back and forth for a few years, and it wasn't really until after Jones was Ko'd vs Tarver, that the majority declared Hops as #1. And then that majority swung to Floyd after Taylor got the decision against Hopkins.


    The examples you gave strengthened the case for both fighters, but neither was an isolated incident that skyrocketed a #5 fighter into the #1 spot.
     
  9. bigtime-skills

    bigtime-skills Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,540
    102
    Apr 20, 2007
    Just PLEASE tell me you're not comparing what Manny Pacquaio has achieved to that of Tito and Roy Jones at their respective careers.:scaredas:.....

    That's TOTAL apples and oranges:patsch

    It's also the "eye" test FOOL and you're just spitting out numbers............If that's the case Manny only received his #1 P4P status by DEFAULT thus making him the WORST EVER Ring p4p champ....

    And I LOVE Manny, just don't use no damn formulas, this is boxing:nono
     
  10. juanitoboxing

    juanitoboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,010
    1
    Jul 28, 2008
    I think it has to do a lot on perspective, if Hatton schools Pacquiao (which I doubt) then it would be fair to say that he will break into the top 5 if its a controversial win then it would be up for debate. Hopkins schooled Trinidad before stopping him in the 12th so the obvious reaction was to put him up there. Roy made history and the reaction was obvious.
     
  11. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    Didn't you read? Argument is not only a possible, 33% chance of a WIN over a guy who JMM lost to (I had JMM winning by the way), but the chance to OUTDO JMM by a knocking him out or beating convincingly, which he didn't do no matter how you scored the fight.
     
  12. SHOWSHOOTER

    SHOWSHOOTER Active Member Full Member

    789
    0
    Oct 13, 2008
    no way in this world would hatton be ranked number 1 p4p even if he knocked pacquiao out in the 1st round.

    hatton has been a 140 pounder his entire carear bar his very fortunate victory at 147 v collazo and getting absoloutely demolished at 147 v mayweather. basically hatton is a one weight fighter, he cannot transfer his undoubted pedigree at light-welterweight in different weight divisions.

    manny pacquiao has won world titles in 5 weight divisions
    - flyweight - 107 lbs
    - super bantamweight
    - featherweight
    - super featherweight
    - lightweight

    when manny beat oscar de la hoya (non world title fight) he skipped another 2 weight divisions (unbelievable) to fight at welterweight (147 lbs).

    manny has fought from 107 lbs to 147lbs and transfered his pedigree up all those weights. he has won world titles over a span of 3 stones which is one of the most incredible achievements in boxing history.

    its the equivelant of hatton moving up to the light heavyweight division and beating calzaghe or hopkins.

    manny in this fight is fighting at 140lbs for the 1st time in his career, the fact that manny is considered favourite in this fight is staggering because hatton has such a big natural weight advantage its untrue. no matter what hatton does in this fight he could never ever ever rank higher than manny in the p4p list.

    hatton could never go above marquez either who has convincingly won world titles at
    - featherweight
    - super featherweight
    - lightweight
    - super lightweight

    and now wants to fight the winner of manny/hatton at welterweight.

    paul williams is a welter weight who has just beat winky wright at middleweight

    mayweather won 5 world titles in 5 different weight divisions.

    hopkins has transfered his pedigree through 3 weight divisions.

    hatton could never rank above these sort of fighters in the p4p rankings and i know its getting on the tits of thousands of educated boxing fans about the way hatton is talking about the p4p title being transferable in this fight - it doesn't work that way, and he needs stop talking out of his ar$e about it.


    btw i am a massive hatton fan but this whole subject is annoying me.
     
  13. FINITO

    FINITO Boxing Junkie banned

    8,773
    2
    Jan 29, 2009
    Bingo !

    :thumbsup
     
  14. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,461
    1,723
    Nov 20, 2007
    So... what you say is that actually BEATING the current P4P#1 guy and not receiving the spot by default is worse... than receiving by default? PacMan doesn't deserve being #1 beacause he never beat the #1, but when Hatton does exactly that, he doesn't get that spot, but JMM does by default (with PacMan losing)? :think

    So WHO (active fighter) should he beat to get that spot, if PacMan, the #1 is not enough? Beating JMM... who lost to Pac in a close one?
     
  15. Zaryu

    Zaryu Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,985
    43
    Dec 7, 2007
    It was a humor based comment, but either way, I think if Ricky stops Pacquiao impressively (like B-Hop over Trinidad) he has a very strong argument. But merely beating him at 140lbs doesn't seem enough in my eyes. Although Roach said 140lbs is Pacquiao's best weight right now, I don't think it is his absolute best weight, which is how p4p rankings are suposed to be measured, and not jumping from division to division. Don't get me wrong, jumping weight classes is one of the best ways to establish your argument of p4p, but it's not truly what the argument is about. :good