Fact or Fiction: Floyd would still be undefeated...

No mother****er, the difference between Floyd and Manny is skill, record, chin, and ppvs.

 

Wow, you are joking right, Morales, Barrera, were passed their best when Manny beat them. On manny's resume those are the only one worth talking about. the Catch weight fights are a joke and truthfully Marquez beat him 2 out of the 3 fights. Then everyone that Manny and Roach turned down Floyd fought. Marquez, Mosley and Ortiz all tried to get in the ring with Manny and Freddie said point blank no. Then Freddie is constantly bragging about how the catchweights give them the advantage. If Manny is so much the man why does his trainer feel he needs some kind of advantage every fight.

 

Better question you ****ing troll, who on Pacquiaos resume could beat Floyd?

 

Back at you how many of Manny's opponents would have beat a prime Mosley, you see that's just a loaded question.

 

Pacquiaos style didn't even keep him undefeated mother****er, lmao!

 

You know something is wrong when you come on ESB and discuss the fighters you hate more then the one's you love.

I'll just give the standard answer to yet another Floyd hater thread that does nothing but keep Floyd relevant whether he's fighting or not.

"When you have haters, it means your doing something right!"

This content is protected

Floyd Jr - "Don't hate me! Get like me!"

 

you got me but at a catch weight what about a fight not at a disadvantage.

 

You think Mosley was prime when he fought Cotto!

This content is protected

 

Dlh fought a prime Shane at ww. Forrest fought a prime Shane at ww. Cotto barely outboxed an older Shane at ww. Try again!

 

JL Castillo I...if three crooked judges didn't bail him out he would already have a loss on his record now.