(FACT) Spence's BEST WIN Isn't Even In Pacquiao's Top 15 (!!!)

you are persistent in equating where they are or were in their careers when facing certain fighters, with what their natural weight is. again, it does not work that way. nature squeezed out 2 natural 140 lb men. thats the coding in their genetics. if anything, pac may have been designed to be bigger, but improper nutrition and rest at the crucial adolescent age, robbed him of his full growth potential.
pac is not smaller than mikey.

 

Ehhhh Pac made 122 with ease.

 

my laaawwwd!

 

Brook.. who many believed was the best WW at the time

Spence beats him in front of his own crowd. And trust me the atmosphere was very very against Spence..

How on Earth is that not his best win in your opinion?

 

Brook is his best win.

And Pac is like 40 with an ATG resume, why is this comparison being made exactly?

 

Yes. But, to be fair, the injury (received in the Golovkin fight) played a role as well.

 

Wasn’t it the other eye? I’m not sure tho

 

https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/were-kell-brooks-eye-injuries-related.588009/

 

It's the same skull, isn't it Also psychological — after a very serious and painful injury to expect something similar about to happen again it's quite, well... Let's say unpleasant.

 

I don't have to go full-Pac to agree with this. Perhaps Brook slides into the top 15 of Pacs', but that is all and at best. I feel the current top tier (P4P talk) is much less proven than the top tier of not very long ago. So it seems kind of weird. Why any claim in any usual direction can be disputed to some degree.

 

Errol Spence could drink Manny 2 Pac K Ow under the table son!!

 

A couple things at play here I think. The promoters are getting more territorial over fighters and belts. There is a war instigated by Haymon to monopolize fighters and belts. Also, fighters are less active than years ago. Simply fighting less. Also, fighters are waiting longer to step up. Thus shortening their own prime. Also, FMJ did a disservice to the sport by placing too much value on being undefeated. Instead of taking the toughest fights possible.

Also had Kovalev gotten the nod over Ward which I thought he deserved he would have cracked into a the top 3 for Pac wins. I'd have that win on par with Pacquiaos win against Marquez in the 2nd fight. Though I can't see anybody topping Pacquiaos obliterations of MAB and Cotto for some time.

 

'Had to give you a career to destroy it'