Fake ShoBox CompuBox numbers are the clearest sign their will be a robbery.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hamiltonporter, Mar 15, 2014.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. hamiltonporter

    hamiltonporter Member Full Member

    410
    56
    Jul 23, 2010
    I'm sorry I can say with 100 % certainty that Danny Garcia didn't land even close to the amount of punches Herrera landed. It wasn't even close, even not paying attention I could see that. Yet the final Shobox numbers had them landing close to even.

    If you want an obvious reason why its so fake, just look at every single clinch initiated. Herrera will throw 5 plus shots each time to Danny's 0. Not to mention he was throwing more the whole fight.

    So if the supposed network's non-biased punch counting program is obviously lying, you know the judges scoring will be even worse. At least Paulie called them out.
     
  2. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    didnt see graccia landed flush. barely if any.
     
  3. Kevin Willis

    Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,692
    11,866
    Jan 16, 2013
    Our sport really does suck.
     
    Eksman likes this.
  4. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,453
    7
    Apr 26, 2010
    Compubox is one guy per fighter. Three judges cant get it right half the time. Dont expect one guy to get it right. The numbers are just an aid and should be taken with a grain of salt.
     
  5. box4life11

    box4life11 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,614
    18
    Apr 5, 2009
    Boycott Showtime simple.
     
  6. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,883
    Nov 27, 2010
    Showtime = CR@P
     
  7. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,058
    Nov 2, 2013
    power shots were a joke. it was herrera who was doing the hitting
     
  8. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.