Louis done what authentic greats do and overturned a disputed dec/loss by pasting Jersey out by knockout in the immediate rematch. Your idol Vitali got beat by Byrd and offered him no rematch. To add insult to injury , Byrd took the fight on 8 days notice and had never seen any footage of Vitali.. LMAO.. He never even seen him fight and still beat him on 8 days notice..
Read my first post. I was just wondering about the footage and how they came to the score cards The website is interesting. I feel Walcott won the fight and was robbed. The surviving video and audio, plus those scoring at ringside all agree with me. If finding out or examining new data is disgraceful to you, I suggest you opt out of new data or pick a fight Greg Page was actually in shape for one won.
One won? What the actual F? It's always the same with you Mendoza, different week same tired old pathetic agendas. Next week we should expect the Vitali - Lewis tear jerker.
The pursuit of the truth, with nothing less than the lineal heavyweight champions at stake, should interest serious fans. Maybe I should not speak for everyone; it interests me, and when I see new data, or even a rare filmed fight, I sometimes share it here. Jeannette vs. Langford anyone : ) But then again, not everyone can handle the truth of an apparent robbery ( as it hurts their agenda ) , or a promise re-match avoided. To Louis credit, he did give the re-match. But I'm pretty sure he lost the first fight. Are you saying you don't want new evidence in the form of scorecards or video on the above? And don't be a doubled standard contradictory wanker Mr. Thomas, as your threads on Holmes avoiding Page have been seen and read here multiple times. In truth, you aren't a bad poster here.
Spare me. Myself and countless others who lived the time owned those threads. Obnoxiousness only gets one so far when barrelled with facts.
Facts are something that bother you as if your are wearing shoes two sizes too small. I will spare you bumping the numerous anti Holmes / prop up Greg Page threads, only because we both know what I wrote was 100% true. That is your " agenda ". But I must ask, based on the score cards from 3rd party people, the thunderous boos on audio when the decision was announced, the body language of the fighters and the surviving film, who do you think won the fight?
Louis said he had no doubt he won the fight but that he was disgusted with the fight he put up. He said this in his autobiography, and he said it on national TV with Walcott sitting next to him in the programme ,"The Way It Was" Are you calling him a liar?
What fighters say after the fight means what? A clear loser usually says he felt he won the fight. Do you even watch boxing? I've seen this 1000 times. You problem remains taking a passage from a book as gospel truth with first hand witness! DUH. Louis also said he did not feel he could beat Marciano, because he did not like to be crowded? Do you believe him? I have posted factual information on this fight. A few facts and truth for you and the readers: Louis was down in rounds one and four. Louis was so disgusted by his performance that he attempted to leave the ring as soon as the fight ended, but he was restrained by his handlers. A ringside poll of 32 boxing writers had 21 scoring the bout for Walcott, ten scoring it for Louis and one calling it a draw My opinions: 1 ) If you watch films and have some idea as to what the body language of the loser looks like, Louis fits. 2 ) the Thunderous boo from the crowd from the decision tells you everything as does Walcott's corner's reaction to it. 3 ) The Surviving video shows Walcott the better.