Fans score cards on Louis vs Walcott 1

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Dec 8, 2017.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Do you seriously think there is anyone on this forum who doesnt know that Walcott dropped Louis twice? That Louis tried to leave the ring? Neither fact indicates that Louis lost the fight. You are trying to construct a scenario which will enable you arrive at a definitive verdict as to who won a fight a fight which you yourself have not seen in its entirety.Everyone who has responded to this thread has said how absurd your crusade is yet still you persist in it! You said on a post just a while ago that ;


    "I feel Walcott won the fight and was robbed. The surviving video and audio, plus those scoring at ringside all agree with me." This is a blatant lie and you know it, because you have been called and corrected on it several times before.A third of the press voted for Louis!

    Another point, Louis never said Rocky would have beaten him when asked how it would turn out he said ,"oh I don't know I had a secret I didn't like to be crowded ." I believe that but I don't believe you! Because you are a proven liar.
    Another point.No fight that was as supposedly close as this one was can be justifiably called a robbery!
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    You might want to ask your sudden defender in McGrain if Louis said that.

    The data I presented suggest Walcott should have won, you ignorant buffoon. You come back with NADA as usual.

    Your so stupid, the point the FACT a ringside poll of 32 boxing writers had 21 scoring the bout for Walcott, ten scoring it for Louis and one calling it a draw means nothing to you.

    And as I'm sure you know or more like can look it up, Walcott had Louis down THREE times in two fights.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,065
    Mar 21, 2007
    The usual:

    Walcott accrued no points for the KDs.

    The "scorecard" you yourself produced a few years back was scored under the ten points must system, and when the KDs were removed you yourself had it as an extremely close fight.

    Ring Magazine scored it for Louis.

    The New York Times scored it for Louis. One or the other of these (can't remember) claimed that Louis landed more punches in the fight.

    10 guys ringside scoring for a given fighter is not locked up robbery territory. It dwarfs the number and % of scorecards for Pacquiao-Bradley and it's far more in keeping with DeGale-Truax (on the other night). That's not to say Pacquiao robbed and so Walcott wasn't, but if you include the judges that's 12 qualified people in the area that scored for Louis. This is not negligable.

    On balance it is likely that the fight should have gone to Walcott but given that there is no complete footage, a dozen people ringside saw it for the champion, and people like you and me, Mendoza, produce very very close scorecards when we stoop to scoring the highlights, deciding it's a robbery isn't reasonable IMO.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    He will regurgitate this every so often, just as he does the knockdown of Jack Johnson in a spar by GunBoat Smith which he continually mis -represents as a tko for Smith! The first Godoy fight in which, according to him Louis was aided by corrupt scoring .Tommy Burns went into the Jack Johnson fight suffering form jaundice etc its all just so much BS that has been discredited and blown completely out of the water time and time again.No point in dignifying it with further debate.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,823
    44,488
    Apr 27, 2005
    Facts? You are the biggest liar on the forum, bar none. You've been called out HUNDREDS of times. You wouldn't know facts if they belted you across the chops.

    This is who you are.
     
    mcvey likes this.