FANTASY FIGHT: Harry Greb vs Joe Calzaghe (15 Rounds/Poll)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Aug 21, 2026 at 11:45 AM.


Harry Greb vs Joe Calzaghe

  1. Harry Greb

    71.0%
  2. Joe Calzaghe

    29.0%
  1. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,568
    29,220
    Jun 26, 2009
    None of my fantasies involve Joe Calzaghe.
     
    slash and Rumsfeld like this.
  2. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran

    11,605
    15,134
    Mar 24, 2019
    What footage of Greb have you seen?Please show
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  3. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    3,205
    Mar 31, 2021
    I was talking about his opponents.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,994
    28,005
    Feb 15, 2006
    Somebody once asked me which contemporary fighter Harry Greb was most like, and I replied that from the newspaper reports, he sounds rather like Joe Calzaghe.

    So how am I supposed to make sense of this one?
     
    Greg Price99 likes this.
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,464
    87,416
    Aug 21, 2012
    That's what I said!

    Greb on resume for me. But without footage it becomes quite hard to evaluate. I rate Calzaghe highly.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,994
    28,005
    Feb 15, 2006
    You can of course go with teh old fallback of, "Greb on resume in the absence of anything else to go on."

    I also came round to having a high opinion of Calzaghe, and I think that he rates higher head to head, than he does on resume.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    41,999
    11,356
    Mar 7, 2012
    If not all?

    Get real.

    Also, Joe wasn’t greatly skilled.

    What made Joe great, was his great attributes.

    Like Greb.

    His fast hands.

    His swarming style.

    His great engine.

    He was awkward.

    He was never a southpaw technician though.

    He could be wild and scrappy at times. He could cuff with the inside of his gloves. Just like descriptions of Greb.

    You make decent posts.

    Then you show your ignorance.

    Even if modern day fighters in general were better, your only concern should be Joe himself.

    You’re looking specifically at him and nobody else from the modern era. Just him.

    Just both of those guys.

    How you think they’d have matched up on the night stylistically.

    You can’t just pick Joe because you think that modern fighters were generally better, and he was a modern fighter.

    Now if you’d seen Joe’s career and you’ve read up on Greb’s, then this would have been a great fight.

    Joe was bigger. He’d have been a career LHW in Greb’s day.

    You can definitely favour him.

    But don’t do it just on a lazy generalisation.
     
  8. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    31,362
    38,537
    Jul 24, 2004
    Greb comprehensively beat Tunney once for sure and possibly twice more based on newspaper writers opinions. Does anyone seriously rank Joe higher than Tunney?

    Greb in a slap fest.
     
    slash likes this.
  9. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,768
    42,711
    Jul 4, 2014
    Oh dear. THE Harry Greb...who threw 20,000 punches against Tiger Flowers and then fought Micky Walker in the bar later that night, only to fight Gene Tunney two days later and call out Dempsey, who was afraid to fight him?

    I would be shocked if Calzaghe maintains the 30% he's at now.
     
  10. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    3,205
    Mar 31, 2021
    I am.

    I never claimed he is the epytome of skill. My point was that, on average, Joe beat more skilled boxers than Greb, of whom we have no video of in order to be able to make a proper assessment.

    I have said this before:
    When I judge greatness, I look at how good a boxer was and what he achieved in his era.
    So from this perspective, Greb is 2nd greatest for me after SRR.
    But when I judge hypothetical H2H scenarios, in 90% of the cases, old timers pre 1930-1940 usually stand no chance vs more modern boxers.
    Now, given that I have no footage of Greb that might make me think otherwise, I'm obviously gonna lean towards Calzaghe.
     
  11. thistle

    thistle Boxing Junkie

    8,481
    9,090
    Dec 21, 2016
    More Skilled than Greb???

    the man fought 200 fights, you don't think he dealt with some Skill, of course he did and dozens of times.
     
    Noel857 likes this.
  12. White Bomber

    White Bomber Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,783
    3,205
    Mar 31, 2021
    Greb obviously also dealth with skilled boxers, but they were skilled for their era, not for the modern one. On average, their skill is inferior to that of more modern boxers.
     
  13. Noel857

    Noel857 I Am Duran

    11,605
    15,134
    Mar 24, 2019
    If anything the opposite is true
     
    thistle likes this.
  14. Cornucopia

    Cornucopia Member Full Member

    113
    93
    Jul 27, 2026
    Greb fought 299 *official* fights, well over 300 when including newspaper decisions.

    I agree it is folly to believe that he did not fight many very skilled men.
    While some progress is made technically, some styles & methods become lost.

    Also some things that look bad may be as a result of rule changes.
     
  15. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    41,999
    11,356
    Mar 7, 2012
    You can’t be taken seriously if you’re being genuine.

    Pep, Dempsey, Tunney, Leonard and Louis etc, could all have had mixed success in other eras.

    They could have beaten some modern day fighters, within their weight classes.


    Did Joe beat more skilled boxers than Greb?

    A 43 year old Bernard Hopkins was Joe’s most skilled opponent.


    It’s okay leaning towards Joe.

    But do it for the right reasons.


    Pick him, because of how you think they’d have matched up on the night stylistically.

    Not just because he’s the more modern fighter.


    You should do that in any fantasy match up.