where is the Dempsey KO option.?..u think Haye's chin woud stand up tp the hardest puncher of his time?....the Manassa mauler beat guys much bigger than him..
Dempsey was a rugged, mostly rudimentary skilled 1920s brawler...how anyone can say he'd beat ANY skilled modern heavyweight (or even lightheavy) is just...ridiculous.
acually he is an ATG...u don't realize how feared and how long his reign was....Haye's chin is too soft for Jack..
**** this!, Anyway... For ****z sake. Dempsey by KTFO. (Just because) Now who is a better basketball player, Michael Jordan or Bob Cousy?
Its stupid comparing sportspeople from different eras. Better training,nutritions etc. Its like comparing Babe Ruth to A-Rod, or Wilt Chamberlain to Shaq. Its silly.
You've missed his point entirely. People like Haye didnt exist in the 20s. His size,strength and speed,and even skill set were unheard of at the time. Thats why its stupid to compare fighters of different eras. By modern standards,Dempsey wasnt even a heavyweight. You can compare legacies,but comaring head to head is just stupid.
haye is arguably the best finisher since mike tyson those who think dempsey would win are delusional this This content is protected vs this This content is protected COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ANIMALS carl froch would probably school jack
atsch The fact that you think Haye is more skilled than Dempsey speaks for itself. The all around skill set of guys like Dempsey or Tunney far exceed that of the average belt holder today from 175-HW.
Dempsey didn't have roids to rely on in the 1920's. You look at Haye when he was a 19/20 y/o amateur, he was skinny assed punk.
funny how people talk about todays heavyweight division being ****... then threads like this are made. whats next, Dempsey loses to Audley Harrison?