I don't get what's with all these fantasy match-ups cropping out like mushrooms here and there, every minute, regardless who the protagonists are. Is it a form of rant? A venting out of emotion? A form of self validation? What? Is it like a wet dream where one gets an erection out of every reply that he/she gets from members and that ultimately leads to an orgasm when the thread starter's view is overwhelmingly confirmed/supported? I really don't get the purpose of it. All I see that comes out of all these fantasy match-ups is hatred. It doesn't lead to constructive criticism nor intellectual debate... a-ah. It only leads to endless arguments, trash talk and polarization of fans from each opposing camp. It's divisive and only breeds contempt! I hope ESB bans fantasy match-up threads. They're simply useless. Wasting time and intellect for something that has and (more often) will never happen... it ain't fantasy... that's simply stupidity for me.
It's what happens with fans of every sport. Comparing great fighters against one another. Deal with it noob.
There is often intellectual debate and I think we can get some things out of them...unfortnately for every rational, intelligent person on ESB you have at least 10 ******s...I just try my best to ignore them.
They are entertaining to read sometimes, I must admit. But to be exposed to a variety of them (whether they are truly forthcoming or only in our dreams), it becomes one fantasy match-up too many. I don't mind the comparison especially if it's unbiased, intellectual and that the participants are open-minded, sport and not stubborn. What's alarming is the behavior... members would say it's a stupid match-up and yet they'll reply as to who's going to win (Do you do it?). Now tell me who's more stupid between the two. Call me naive, noob (yeah, just because I have 13 posts) or whatever, but I believe if people truly ignore such out-of-this-world fantasy match-ups then I do believe such menacing threads would decrease.
So you're not interested in who would hypothetically win if "Prime Tony Tubbs" were to fight a "fit and motivated Lawrence Cley-Bey"?
So does that mean both of you will be buying popcorn to see who would hypothetically win between the remastered black & white original king kong of 1933 and the i-maxed digitalized king kong 0f 2005? Remember, we are talking about fantasy match-ups here.
Oh wait... which Rocky? Rocky Balboa from part 1, 2, 3 ,4... Better not be from part 4... nuthuggers of Rocky might say he is shot by then if he 'hypothetically" loses.
LOL...look at this post and look at the noobs post....this proves u don't have to have 7,000 posts to have a clue...he is right...an example of this is a thread like HAGLER v PBF???who wins...then a bunch of trolls come in and **** all over PBF for 7 pages...these things are stupid cuz most posters do it with the intent of hating on one fighter
lol...rocky 2 vs andre dirrelll...but rocky 2 before the 2nd creed fight cuz he was SHOT after that...and at 175 lbs where he was UNDERRATED as opposed to OVERRATED at HW...not sure ROCKY'S GLASS JAW holds up though I mean he was down a few times in 1....plus rocky shouldn't be DUCKING clubber lang...I will take Dirrell
that is not fantasy that is reality??? and i didn't do that cuz I hate pavlik....the poll speaks for itself