Now that we've seen Adamek against a big man which he didn't look at that impressive against. Do you guys think that with Chambers being more impressive against a big in Dimentreko that people could be leaning towards chambers more if they were to fight one another?
Well Chambers beat a Ring top 10 fighter convincingly (in Germany!) whereas Adamek struggled massively against a glass chinned top 100 boxer who's 10 years past his prime and who was crushed twice even in his so-called "prime". Chambers decision
This is a dream fight for me - preferably at cruiserweight but I'll take it either way. Pick'em with or without a limit.
Ummm.... Tough one. I say chambers by close but ud. Adamek is tough as a coffin nail and has a decent skill set. But in my opinion chambers could reign as champ in a klit-less heavy weight division.
I think Adamek beats Chambers. Adamek has more in his arsenal than Chambers. Chamber just has a quick one two and a lena back. Adamek is a decent, if not extraordinary all- around fighter. Adamek he also has a greater desire to fight and win. Eddie Chambers does not have that, even when he wins, Chambers likes to just get by. It's possible that Chambers could win between them, but I think Adamek is the more likely winner.
In the main event? No. Of course not. But add the above fight on any major under card and you got yourself something that is worth $50.
It bugs me when people refer to eddie chambers as "fast". hes slow as ****, fat as **** and **** as ****.
This would be a nice fight. I think Chambers is too crafty and takes an UD. Unlike in the Wlad fight Adamek will not make him gun shy because he isn't as powerful as Wladdy.
