"Fast" Eddie Chambers

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, Dec 19, 2010.


Page 3 of 5
  1. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,250
    78,535
    Nov 30, 2006
    Well, he obviously still is a contender if he's entering a box-off for a #1 spot. :deal
     
    IntentionalButt, Dec 22, 2010
    IntentionalButt, Dec 22, 2010
    #31
  2. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
    That's indeed prety good shape outside the ring, but still I think he is too small to compete with current big HW's. Even though he poses a great threat to most HW's, I think he is too gifted and should compete in the smaller weight divisions...
     
    Keueng, Dec 22, 2010
    Keueng, Dec 22, 2010
    #32
  3. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    I think Adamek would be a real test and a fight for Chambers.

    He is a fantastic boxer with great skill and speed, no question. He is still top five/six in my book, and I can see him beating Peter and Arreola.

    I'd like to see him rematch Povetkin.
     
    Heavyrighthand, Dec 22, 2010
    Heavyrighthand, Dec 22, 2010
    #33
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,250
    78,535
    Nov 30, 2006
    I'd rather see those two vying for Cruiserweight supremacy (as they would be the 2 best right now). :deal
     
    IntentionalButt, Dec 22, 2010
    IntentionalButt, Dec 22, 2010
    #34
  5. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007
    They should seriously consider a HW tourney and including Wlad or Vitali, Haye, Adamek, Chambers, Dimitrenko, Povetkin and Solis.... it would serve to clear up the current jam log between K-bros/Adamek/Haye and could possibly produce some surprises. Anything else is not too interesting at this point.
     
    lzolnier, Dec 22, 2010
    lzolnier, Dec 22, 2010
    #35
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,250
    78,535
    Nov 30, 2006
    Chambers-Rossy II is official - February 11th on ShoBox. :deal
     
    IntentionalButt, Jan 3, 2011
    IntentionalButt, Jan 3, 2011
    #36
  7. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Chambers is better than Haye.
     
    Farmboxer, Jan 3, 2011
    Farmboxer, Jan 3, 2011
    #37
  8. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,684
    Sep 8, 2010
    I like Chambers a lot. Unfortunately, the most exciting bit of his Klitschko fight was when he tried to lift him up and body slam him. Didn't win any 30 second span of the whole fight. More Klitschko than Chambers, to my estimation.
     
    Nonito Smoak, Jan 3, 2011
    Nonito Smoak, Jan 3, 2011
    #38
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,250
    78,535
    Nov 30, 2006
    Well, it certainly isn't a knock on him that the greatest active heavyweight (a monstrous super heavyweight, no less) completely shut him out when he himself should arguably be competing at 200lbs.

    He's still young. Once WK retires, there is a good chance Chambers could inherit the throne if he stays active, motivated and on top of his game (consistently challenging himself, while avoiding the giants).
     
    IntentionalButt, Jan 3, 2011
    IntentionalButt, Jan 3, 2011
    #39
  10. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Still think Chambers will win, but Rossy is a lot better now than the first time they fought.
     
    Brickhaus, Jan 3, 2011
    Brickhaus, Jan 3, 2011
    #40
  11. Englund

    Englund Warrior Full Member

    2,545
    3
    Feb 17, 2010
    Wow, is the heavyweight division that bad that they have to recycle Wlad's opponents that much? Wlad just DESTROYED Peter. He beat Chambers pretty bad, too. Not that Chambers is bad, but he just lost in his campaign for the title. I can agree that not too many other fighters deserve a shot, but that just goes to show that there are really only 3-5 actually viable contenders for the heavyweight crown.
     
    Englund, Jan 3, 2011
    Englund, Jan 3, 2011
    #41
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,250
    78,535
    Nov 30, 2006
    ...or that the champion is pretty good.
     
    IntentionalButt, Jan 3, 2011
    IntentionalButt, Jan 3, 2011
    #42
  13. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    it's a combination. wlad could be like holmes and avoid a number of top 10 contenders for years and spread out his reign:D (just kidding...kinda)
     
    Jorodz, Jan 3, 2011
    Jorodz, Jan 3, 2011
    #43
  14. uglyandproud7

    uglyandproud7 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,882
    15
    Nov 15, 2009
    im surprised noone has ever mentioned Haye-Chambers.

    I'd favor Chambers to outbox/outspeed him and to win fairly easily (even though it would say SD by judges)
     
    uglyandproud7, Jan 3, 2011
    uglyandproud7, Jan 3, 2011
    #44
  15. Englund

    Englund Warrior Full Member

    2,545
    3
    Feb 17, 2010
    I don't take credit away from Wlad, but for only a small handful of fighters deserving a shot at the title; even after they fought for it and lost? I think that is outrageous. Take nothing away from the few viable contenders or the champions, just that there are only that many in consideration.

    Peter and Chambers lose, somebody else should get a shot. Unfortunately, not many other fighters deserve the shot.
     
    Englund, Jan 3, 2011
    Englund, Jan 3, 2011
    #45
Page 3 of 5