Faster hands.. Roy Jones or Ray Robinson??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Quickhands21, Oct 27, 2008.


  1. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    275
    Oct 4, 2005
    Calling that beauty of a left hook "pure accident" is downright respectless. He threw the hook with mean intentions, of catching Fulmer as he was coming in and it landed. One punch knockouts are extremely rare and accomplishing it is no small feat. Of course you can't land a punch like that at will, but that doesn't make it any less great. Would you say Tyson knocked out Botha by accident too?
     
  2. werety

    werety Active Member Full Member

    815
    11
    Apr 30, 2007
    How could you say it was pure accident when Robinson mentioned that his strategy before the fight was to capitalize on the fact that Fullmer dropped his RIGHT HAND when coming in and that he wanted to counter based on this weakness?
     
  3. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,855
    2,329
    Jul 11, 2005
    Don't be telling me Fullmer never once dropped his right hand in the other 49 rounds (almost 2 and a half hours) they faced each other in the ring.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,376
    41,334
    Apr 27, 2005
    That's a strange way of looking at things mate.
     
  5. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,855
    2,329
    Jul 11, 2005
    If a fighter is able to land in such way only once in 50 rounds, that's accident to me. He might have not landed with the same devastating effect every time, but had he done a similar trick with Fullmer several times in their fights, then I would take it as a tactical thing of trying to exploit a flaw in the opponent's style, and not something accidental.

    If you watch the 2nd Jones-Griffin fight, you will see that Jones attempted to throw that left hook to the jaw in a very similar manner several times and finally succeeded after several attempts.

    If you watch the Jones-Hill fight attentively, you will notice that Hill was waiting for Jones' jabs and tried to "reply" with his own jab every time, so Roy figured this out and feinted a jab and instead went to the body.

    Not the same thing with Robinson's hook vs Fullmer.
     
  6. werety

    werety Active Member Full Member

    815
    11
    Apr 30, 2007
    Well, first of all, when you repeat 50 rounds to add to the effect of your statements when it was clear that Robinson was pretty much shot for the second two fights with Fullmer his timing speed and reflexes simply weren't there at that point. Furthermore, I mentioned that countering Fullmer coming in wasn't Robinson's strategy for the first fight. So there go most of your 50 rounds.
     
  7. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,037
    Oct 25, 2006
    I'm going for the middle ground here. Clearly Robinson didn't throw the left hook in a tactical sense. He probably didn't anticipate Fullmer to that extent.

    Ray most likely simply saw the opening, took his chance and fired off the hook and saw Fullmer fall to the canvas.
    Did he expect his punch to have such dramatic consequences? Possibly not, but he DID fire off a peach of a punch that filletted Fullmer.

    So maybe he didn't use it in a tactical way, but throwing that good of a shot in a nanosecond takes serious ability.

    That's good enough for me.
     
  8. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,855
    2,329
    Jul 11, 2005
    Yeah, 15 rounds in their 1st fight wasn't enough for Robinson to notice this flaw and think of a way how to exploit it. He needed another 4 months of thinking to come up with a plan. And Fullmer, of course, got even faster for their 3rd and 4th fights, and now he had a considerable advantage over Robinson in handspeed and timing.
     
  9. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    80
    Jul 9, 2008
    Jones had faster hands, Robinson had more power in his combinations and comitted to delivering with power much more consistently than Jones.

    Senya, are you comparing Malinga favorably to Fullmer?
     
  10. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,855
    2,329
    Jul 11, 2005
    Robinson had more power in his combinations in which fights in particular? That are on film that is. Even in his welter days he looked more about flurries of punches than on combinations of punches intended to hurt.

    Fullmer is grossly overrated, he was tough but primitive. I don't think he's more improved as a boxer than LaMotta, for example.
     
  11. Azania

    Azania Active Member Full Member

    583
    45
    Oct 26, 2006
    Let me come out and say it....Sugar Ray Robinson,at full flow,is the most complete fighter I've ever seen...There's not too many fighters that can throw a six punch comibination,with every one of them KO written all over it....Ray was a master at that..But that,mostly had to do with his style...Ray was a boxer with an offensive mind....He could have tried to look cutey and be defensive like...Roy Jones..but he was who he was.

    My answer to the question...IMHO...shot for shot...I say Roy Jones was better...not by a lot mind you..but Ray had the better delivery IMO.The way he could reel off those combos effortlessly....with speed and total power,IMO puts him where belongs...at the top of the heap...

    And this was nearly 60 yrs ago btw...Just a reminder y'all.For raw physical power,Roy Jones probably has no equals..The man was gifted.Athletic ability was his signature.Too bad,we never really got to see Jones at his absolute best...He had the chance to be P4P the best of all-time,but he nevr reached for it IMO.

    But yeah..I say Jones.
     
  12. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    30
    May 15, 2007
  13. ThinBlack

    ThinBlack Boxing Addict banned

    4,768
    26
    Sep 18, 2007
    Roy, but not by much.