Faster Handspeed Dempsey Or Marciano?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 17, 2015.


  1. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,764
    Jul 1, 2015
    This implies that the fighter who fought lesser opposition would lose or do worse.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,292
    53,803
    Feb 11, 2005
    I certainly offers some proof to that end... while wistful ruminations provide nothing.
     
  3. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    What if fighter A fights lesser opponents than fighter B, but then beats fighter B in a match?
     
  4. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,305
    19,854
    Apr 26, 2006
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,292
    53,803
    Feb 11, 2005
    Then he suddenly has beaten a better opponent.
     
  6. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    But is he better than fighter B?
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,655
    Jun 2, 2006
    Who had Tyson Fury beaten when he faced Wlad?
     
    Brixton Bomber likes this.
  8. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,270
    Sep 5, 2011
    In what other sport do you judge a performer or team with a lesser record against lesser opposition to be the superior?

    This is simply leaving all real world evidence behind. I would say the thinking here is closer to a religion than to a science. It is simply a belief based on personal faith.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2017
    Seamus likes this.
  9. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,270
    Sep 5, 2011
    But then it wouldn't be a fantasy match.

    Also it isn't just fighting inferior opposition. A man undefeated against lesser opposition is simply unproven. One can't be certain how good he might be. Ali before the first Liston fight is an excellent example.
     
  10. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,270
    Sep 5, 2011
    What is the point here? If A has an inferior record against lesser opposition than B, and then loses in a match with B, is there any basis at all, and I mean at all, in judging A superior?
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,292
    53,803
    Feb 11, 2005
    To win this head to head argument, someone needs to convince me that the Willard, Brennan, Firpo, Fulton which Dempsey faced were a better lot, in a head to head sense than the Walcott, Charles, Moore and Louis that Marciano faced... and that hasn't been done.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,853
    51,963
    Mar 21, 2007
    Jesus...so who do you have Roy Jones beating at MW?
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,292
    53,803
    Feb 11, 2005
    With Jones, we can at least decide to which degree to factor his wins at 168, 175 and heavy. With Dempsey, there are no victories in other weight classes.

    Still, in beating two future champs at 160, Roy did about as good as Dempsey who beat one former and one future champ.
     
  14. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,464
    2,824
    Aug 26, 2011
    So what do you believe and what don't you believe from him? How do you pick and choose? He's clearly been shown to make up stuff as he goes, and frankly, I take some of what he says with a grain of salt. He was in the business of perpetuating myths and stories for his own financial benefit many times, not in the field of finding the truth to perpetuate
     
  15. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,464
    2,824
    Aug 26, 2011
    Except when it came to fighting the best that was in front of him
     
    Seamus likes this.