15 rounds. Although this past Saturday I was very greatful for the 12 round limit when Sergio got into trouble in the 12th.
On this topic,I'm a traditionalist. Fifteen rounds. Among other things,it limits the amount of draws you get in championship fights compared to twelve rounders.
I picked '15 rounds'. I was more tempted by the longer distances than by the '12 round' option. I'd probably rather see finish fights than 12 rounders.
15 is what it should be...it cheapened boxing to go to 12 rounds...and it was the fault of Jose Sillyman mostly....the knee jerk reactions to the Mancini-Kim tragedy.
20 rounds, im ok with 12 rounders but 15 is where i prefer it, a fight to the finish london prize rules style is where it should of always stayed, but with that goes 4 hours of watching guys fight who are to tired to so im on the fence, voted 20 rounds though.
15 rounds is and should be the benchmark for a championship fight, since we've had none of those recently 12 rounds will do. 15 rounds will truly set the greats apart.
I'd love to see 20rounders to be honest but i suppose 15 rounds is the best we can hold out any hope for I guess - i guarantee those sort Of distances would see a resurgence in the classic sized heavyweights too and a return to exciting paced fights