Featherweight Fab Four - Erik, Manny, Marco and Juan.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by just-me, Aug 26, 2007.


  1. just-me

    just-me New Member Full Member

    68
    0
    Jan 10, 2007
    There is nothing in Boxing like a trilogy to reveal who the better man is.

    The 4 best featherweights of their generation have had numerous battles with each other in the past. With more to come in the future.

    But if they had fought trilogies Prime 4 Prime. Who would come out on top. My opinion is

    EM vs MAB, This one happened I know but you cannot split them. Flip a coin three times to decide the winner. 2-1 Marco

    MAB vs Manny, Bad match up for Barrera the first fight was one-sided but 3 fights Prime 4 Prime would give Marco a chance to sneak one their rematch will support this. However 2-1 Pac.

    Manny vs Juan, Their fight looked looked to be a beat down but it finished with a schooling. Look 4 Marquez to outboxed Pac twice. But it would be third time lucky for Manny as he catches Juan and stops him late. 2-1 Juan.

    Erik vs Pac, IMO I see no way that Prme Pacquiao could beat a Prime Morales. The first 16/17 rounds of their trilogy is evidence, as a battle weary and weight drained Morales was still able to handle Pacman. 3-0 Morales.

    Erik vs Juan, Sadly no fight took place, but you could almost guarantee it would be close. EM wins an exciting 1st. Marquez chooses to only box and wins the 2nd. 3rd goes to Erik in an Israel v Rafa firefight minus the dodgy chins. 2-1 Erik

    Juan vs Marco, I See 2 entertaining Boxing/Brawling fights ie juan vs marco 1 and a boring fight won by marquez. 2-0-1 Marquez

    Apologies if I bored anyone but im interested in any different points of view.
     
  2. griff

    griff WOODDDDDDDYA Full Member

    5,548
    0
    Dec 14, 2006
    Great fighters all of them, Hamed deserves to be up there too.
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    hamed imo, could not stomach a trilogy with any of them.
     
  4. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Problem is that JMM just waits there while EM, MAB and Pac all beat the hell out of each other.
     
  5. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Absolutely no.
     
  6. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,289
    19
    Sep 21, 2006
    Pac/Mab - 3 to 0 Pac, Mab has absolutely nothing on Pacman.

    EM/Pac - 3 to 0 EM, all 3 fights would be close, but EM had a granite chin that couldnt be cracked, he would not be intimidated by Pac's power and would had Pacquiao on the ropes all night long.

    Pac/JMM - 2-0-1(draw) Pac, of course the draw is already including the fact that their only fight together was a draw and no doubt both fighters were in their peaks. I give it to Pac, because from what i saw in the first fight after the 1st round was Pac trying to finish what he started and abandoned his game plan which JMM took advantage of so in a way that 1st round benefitted JMM more than it did Pacman, Ive followed both JMM's entire career and Pac's, and that fight was JMM's best performance to date and one of Pac's worst.

    EM/JMM - 2 to 1 EM, EM dominates JMM by letting JMM be the aggressor, EM's jab would of prevent JMM from even attempting any combinations.

    Mab/JMM - 2 to 1 JMM, last March's fight was exactly how it was expected to be, and cant imagine 2 other fights in their prime any different.


    now if i put Hamed in the picture

    Hamed/Mab - 3 to 0 Mab
    Hamed/Pac - 3 to 0 Hamed
    Hamed/Morales - 2 to 1 Morales
    Hamed/JMM - 3 to 0 JMM
     
  7. etong_08

    etong_08 Active Member Full Member

    690
    0
    May 1, 2007
    Problem with managers and promoters I guess.. :hat
     
  8. griff

    griff WOODDDDDDDYA Full Member

    5,548
    0
    Dec 14, 2006
    Hamed lost to a great fighter, have a look at the other 4 and rate who beat them too.