Felix Sturm: How highly do you rate him?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Brixton Bomber, May 17, 2015.


  1. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,105
    Sep 21, 2013
    Within the last 20-25 years?

    Could he have beaten the greats of his time or not?
     
  2. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    He rates higher than people want to admit. He's been around forever.

    He probably would've beaten Abraham if that fight happened. I don't think he'd beat Taylor. Trinidad and Pavlik could go either way. Martinez at his best would beat him.
     
  3. Jpreisser

    Jpreisser Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,836
    1,403
    Jan 29, 2015
    Hard to say. There have been a ton of good names who have inhabited 160 since 1990, but many of them haven't called it home for very long. For that reason, Sturm probably rates fairly high. Maybe top-15. He has had great staying power, and surely that counts for something, but his competition hasn't been all that good. Excellent jab in his heyday though.

    Oh, and to answer how well he would have done against contemporary greats, I think he would have fairly well. Taylor didn't mind keeping distance, so I can envision a jab battle with Taylor's natural gifts pulling him through a close one. I think he would have done well early against Pavlik with his jab and quickness, but Sturm never moved that much and Pavlik's work rate and power would have broken him down late. Martinez would have outboxed pretty clearly, in my opinion. Golovkin would have beaten him up and Hopkins would have beaten him clearly.