Felix Trinidad vs Simon Brown At WW.

You really dont follow boxing too closely do you? Just get on here and call peope ****s and make stupid comments like this. Do you get most of your information from Boxrec? Some funny comments made by you, especially the Khan comment. Zudah was what 35 when he lost to Khan?

 

Why the name calling?.....real dudes don't deal with feelings and emotions, if you disagree then fine disagree with me, name calling is letting your emotions get in the way and we all know jealousy and emotions should be left up to females.

And me saying I think a fighter beats another fighter in a similar way is not necessarily putting the two supposed victims on the same level either, I can say Julian Jackson kayos a journeyman in two rounds like he did Terry Norris, doesn't mean that I put Terry Norris in the same level as a journeyman now, think things through next time bro.

 

Starling was one of my favorite fighters, but if you knew Starling, you know he'd find a way to lose a fight he should have won. The Blocker fight was typical, and Moocher was past his best.

 

Salty Trunks; you couldn't be more wrong, ask anyone. And how would boxrec tell me that?! Read what BENNY wrote about elevating fighters past their level and then see his Pinto example.

Sister Sledge; I've already said exactly that a few posts back re:Blocker fight. I know Starling; I wrote an acclaimed piece on him. Well acclaimed on here

 

You think things through before you type please; don't criticise when you're doing the same thing.

Also, the above is misogynistic posing. Leave that **** in the 20th century. Bro'.

 

All fair points.

 

None of those guys rate up with Brown as a hitter imo. Getting ko'ed in the mid rounds by Shane Methusaley is enough evidence for me that a prime Brown runs through him.

He might not render him unconscious, Margarito did have a great chin, but his defense was so non-existent that Brown would beat the **** out of him and force a ref stoppage.

 

Well than you should know that Judah was pretty much an old fighter when he lost to Khan or quit.

 

Bull**** and when is the 9th round the middle of a fight?

 

Early = 1-4
Mid = 5-9
Late = 10-12

:good

 

And? It was pretty clear that last point was the least serious. And that has led you to believe I'm a boxrec warrior? Surely Boxrec would tell me his age and make things easier for me anyway? That fight was what, last year? EDIT: Zab was past his best. His timing was largely off against Matthysse (I give Zab more credit than most there) and Mabuza, but he pulled the perfect shot off against Mabuza. I felt he was going to catch Khan, but he was bamboozled by pretty much pure speed.

Khan is one of the most technically inept fighters I have ever seen. Zab should've had enough to beat him by that stage IMO, I was very disappointed in the way he acquitted himself.

Regardless, Judah is not that special a fighter. In terms of lineal champions however, he's about as meaningful as Blocker was.

Can't actually remember why Zab is in the discussion actually...something to do with Cotto? Well, put it this way, not a great scalp by any means IMO. And Judah, as a fighter, is as erratic as they come.

Do you deny that?

 

Judah was a great talent, but seriously, we're talking about a guy that nearly lost to a 40 year old Pineda and actually lost to Carlos Baldomir in his prime. Enough said.

 

:deal

I'm not even sure he was a 'great' talent. Certainly had great speed and a bit of talent.

 

Yeah, perhaps great is too big of a call.

 

And James Toney lost to Drake Thadzi in the middle of his prime. Cmon lets be honest Zudah was a great talent but like Toney he could be lazy and unfocused and look far from his best.
Judah was a great junior welter accomplished a lot at welter and junior middle for a guy his size. Zab is a very small person, looks only to be about 5'5 in person.