I'm not too caught up on KO ratios. It certainly indicates that He had power - but putting him among division's greatest puncher's is another kind of standard of comparision. Don't think anyone will dispute calling Joshua a puncher, but when someone would put in top 5 greatest puncher in division's history, then the word "puncher" has a bit different ring to it and that's where I'm coming from here. Lomachenko had 100% ko rate at Super Featherweight. I don't think anyone ever considered him a puncher and like I wrote earlier, I always thought of Roman in similar way in terms of their punching power. It was moreso about pace They set and precision with which They were able to place their shots. You're right, "washed" was harsh, but I don't think He looked good in some of those fights coming into Gonzalez fight. Don't remember exactly which of those fights made me feel this way, but I remember not being very excited and not expecting much from this fight at the time. He was 35 years old and conditioning was always a problem for him.
I'm only asking this as I'm genuinely curious, I'm certainly not questioning your rankings or your rationale - do you think Roman had more pure, 1-punch power than Donaire, at 112lbs, or are there factors beyond pure 1-punch power, that you've taken into consideration when ranking the greatest ever punchers at Fly?
I think they are important in that if a fighter's KO percentage is very low, he's not able to exhibit whatever power he has in knockouts, I don't care about it - so someone could punch as hard as God based upon testimony and power-machines but if he can't knock people out it's not meaningful for the sport of boxing. If it's very high, that means he can punch if he has been turning that in at title level. I do not accept a non-puncher can achieve a very high KO ratio over, say, ten fights. A high KO % does not guarantee top five status as a puncher in any division. Lomachenko had five fights at the weight and I think either three or four of them were retirements, not knockouts, guys quitting. I think that those stoppages do indicate Lomachenko was hitting with meaningful power - if he wasn't hitting hard, those guys would have fought on - but I would distinguish between stoppages, who you are stopping and how people are stopping them, of course. I disagree for the reasons stated. I accept your position that he is not a puncher and disagree with it. We clearly disagree deeply about Roman's legacy generally - you think the fighters he beat were not good/washed or something like it, I disagree with that too, I think he met on average a very high standard of opponent. If you knock out just about everyone you've fought and you're not boxing your first fifteen contests at the poundage (Against very weak opposition) that is a difference-maker always. Roman didn't stak his enormous KO % against professional losers, he beat highly ranked fighters in true-championship contests (mostly), experienced professional fighters with winning records. It's an astonishing achievement, really.
To be clear, people are welcome to question my rankings or rationale - as I stated in the first post, I'm not married to these rankings and am not really about defending them. I did find the "Roman's not a puncher" chat silly and a bit boring so that may have come through in some of those answers, but people should feel free. Donaire had maybe 5 fights at the weight? I looked - he did three fights in his first eight fights at 112lbs for two knockouts, and four at title-level for four knockouts, which is impressive. I leave it up to you whether or not you think that's enough to qualify him for an all time flyweight list. I'll say guys need ten fights to be considered for mine.
No Belulio Gonzalez? Dude's got a similar KO rate to some of the guys on the list (like Efren Torres), and he's got an all time one hitter quitter against an ultra tough Shoji Oguma.
Just to be clear. When I questioned Roman being a puncher, obviously it is in the Greatest Puncher in Flyweight's history context. It would be more precise to say He's not an ATG puncher. There are "punchers" in any division at any given time. Darchinyan isn't on Your list, but I don't think it means You don't think he was a "puncher". I don't think so. I would have to know just how highly your rank him to know if We have some significantly different view on it, I think it's moreso that We see his legacy in different places. While He might've peaked at 112, He fought better opposition at 108 and 115 so I think fights at those weights is where He built his legacy moreso than at flyweight.
That's completely fair and reasonable, thanks for clarifying. Imo, when people disagree on these sort of lists, it's more often due to a different interpretation on the criteria, than a different interpretation on the fighters themselves, hence my question. I think Roman was an outrageously good offensive machine at 112lbs, who clearly punched hard. I don't consider him as possessing darkening, concusive 1-punch power at the highest level, but he clearly could throw fluid combinations of hard punches, at an exceptional work rate.
Of course. I don't think he would make an ATG list - there is a real dearth of great punchers at flyweight which is why it is such an interesting exercise. That is, being one of the hardest punchers in flyweight history wouldn't make him one of the hardest fifty or sixty punchers in history pound-for-pound. I think there are only two that qualify. But he's definitely one of the best punchers at flyweight, i'd consider that beyond sensible argument. Yes, there are people would could punch hard who are not on this list, and unless you made an extremely long list, that would not appear on any list. I doubt any human has ever listed every single hard puncher in any division, ever.
Fair question. Wilde and Kane are the obvious 2. Of those who competed at 112lbs, I consider Donaire to have concussive 1 punch power in his left hook, but completely understand your rationale for excluding him. I'd have to think about it more to determine whether I think there are any others, but concede none immediately jump out as obvious. I'd guess Avelar, Torres and perhaps even Chitalada as having better 1 punch power than Roman, but depending on criteria, I can certainly see a clear case for Chocolatito being the greater puncher than them all. I'll probably get shot down in flames for this, but it wouldn't surprise me if Shannon Briggs had more, raw 1 punch power than Joe Louis in absolute terms. Arguments that Louis was the greater puncher are overwhelmingly strong, though. It was along those sort of lines that I was curious to your criteria.
I dunno, I think he'd slide into one of the bottom spots in my list. Good timing, clearly heavy handed and has some nice stoppage wins over some really good world level guys (Mathebula x2, Vargas, Oguma, etc)
Yeah, it's very possible that working with one of those machines he'd do more power per square inch, but obviously, in terms of hitting someone hard and making them feel sad, he'd be way behind Louis. Would you say Avelar is an elite puncher in the sense that Kane is an elite puncher, by which I mean, would you group him with the hardest punchers of all time, in a sort of overall sense?
Not quite in a historical context, no, I'd give Kane a clear, though not huge, edge, even though Avelar was obviously a very big puncher. Gonzalez rarely put everything into each punch, but rather sacrificed throwing an individual shot as hard as he could, in favour of typically shorter punches, thrown not only in very high volume, but with great accuracy and leaving him perfectly balanced to follow up with beautifully fluid combinations. The fact he could do that, yet still throw hard with most punches on an individual basis, means I think your ranking of him in this thread is reasonable and defensible, even if I'd rank him differently. Either way, I'd need to spend time doing some research and watching footage of some of the contenders before coming up with a list I'd be confident in.
Definitely think he ranks above Sot Chitilada, at any rate. For that matter, I think a pretty solid case could be made that Ponsaklek ranks above Sot, too.