Fighers who within three fights can POSSIBLY bacome a top 10 atg...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Illmatic, Jul 20, 2007.


  1. deram

    deram Active Member Full Member

    528
    0
    Nov 14, 2004
    Well, that imo. is not just a "just". So far Pac has not really beaten an international row of good opponents. He has basically just beaten people from the same couple of countries.

    So it could be argued that his title is like a latin-american/pilipino belt.

    Well, we know it is called a WORLD championship belt - but he needs to fight someone from the WORLD in order for that to seem credible. Maybe he is the best - well, actually he probably is. However, the best Speedway driver is also English, Australian, American or Scandinavian - because they are basically the only ones competing. Is Speedway then a highly competitive sport? Yes, it is - BUT not as competitive naturally as sports where the whole WORLD actively competes.

    Therefore - a win against a PBF would make a world of difference for someone like Pac. Or a win against Hatton.
     
  2. LeedsLad

    LeedsLad Active Member Full Member

    1,132
    2
    Apr 11, 2007
    RJJ is the only active fighter who can do it in 3 fights, but i dont think he has enough left in the tank to do it. Its arguable that his achievements could make him top 10 now, winning title's from Middleweight to Heavyweight is a particularly big achievement because thats going up like 40lbs. And in his prime, he was never legitimatly beaten.

    Mayweather hasnt been undisputed champion at 130, 135 and 147. He never unified titles, just goes after the WBC strap in every division. To say Cotto, Mosley and Hatton is enough to make him top 10 all-time is laughable. Yes, he'll be an ATG, even if he retired today he will be, but there is easily 10 guys who P4P are better than him AND have beat better fighters.
     
  3. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Before Pac Beat up the best of Mexico, Pac Clean up the best of Thailand, Korea, Indonesia, Australia, Japan & Africa. Pac has nothing to Clean up among the USA & European fighters coz Barrera(Hamed & Mckinney) & Morales(Jones) did the cleaning in that continents. Then JMM Clean up the rest of the Nobodies. Pac fought MAB, EM & JMM while they're on top so your excuse that they're Old shot fighters is not Valid. Pac truly is the Global Destroyer!!! ATG for sure.
     
  4. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,744
    8,259
    Feb 11, 2005
    Wlad has yet to beat a reigning titleholder while champion. Not the same thing.
     
  5. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    The only guy on Floyd's resume that fits that description is Baldomir, and the only reason that even happened that way is because Baldomir didn't pay for the IBF belt to be on the line when he beat Judah. Neither of them have unified anything yet.
     
  6. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Oh come off it. I can name at least 50 fighters who are greater than Pacman all time.

    He is no where NEAR the top 10. And just because an old fighter is still on top and hasn't faced a fighter good enough to beat him, doesn't mean he is in his PRIME. A fighters prime is relative to his fighting peak, not his ranking within the boxing world.
     
  7. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Hmm, for arguments sake...

    Say Calzaghe beats:

    Kessler
    Hopkins
    Dawson

    ... as his next 3...

    Top 50?:think
     
  8. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Who's the top 126 pounder & 130 pounder when Pac fought at that weight????
     
  9. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    it was barrera both times. then pac lost to em (who wasnt the top 130 at anytime when he fought pac em all three times). anyways, he never beat jmm who had a claim to that spot at 126 or 130. now pac is fighting mab again who is rank, third or fourth?

    edit: i meant to say wasnt the top 130 lber.
     
  10. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Hoya above Whitaker? :lol: :lol: :lol:
     
  11. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Why a fight with Barrera(while He's on top) & Pac at didn't happen at 130?? Who ducks Who????
     
  12. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    The best at 126 was not Finalized because who ducks who?????
     
  13. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
    i dunno and how the hell is that relevent to the dicussion of whether or not pac is a top 50 atg?
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    just checked boxrec and you are correct. barrera is the no.1 130 fighter when pac 1st fought there since barrera beats morales via a close MD. i also first thought that morales was the #1 fighter at 130 that time.

    i will still place barrera at #3 at 130 today behind pac and jmm and place guzman at 4th.
     
  15. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Because Pac fought these Greats while they are on top & make them look old. But actually they're not old & not Shot. They just get beaten by a much Greater fighter. Just stop making excuses that pac fought a Shot HOFamer fighters.