Fight Back On! Nevada to decide testing.

@ first I thought this was the most stupid post then I felt pity for insanity

 

No the nevada commission is a baseline requirements body. Everything else that has to do with a fight is negotiated by the fighters. This is abosultely rediculous. Of course nevada is going to say they don't need more testing because they have never deemed it nessisary before.

**** if this is the best pac can do this is crap.

 

Not really considering none of Floyd's past opponents have been suspected of doping to the degree Pacquiao has....

 

Ironic, isn't it? It's the convicted ex-felon (for drugs) that is most concerned about doping.

 

Why he didn't ask for a "clean" oscar, "clean" hatton, etc.?

 

Wrong!

The NSAC cannot use a testing method for one particular fight, and then go back to just urine tests for the status quo........they'd be setting themselves up to major lawsuits from other fighters being tested just for urine samples.

Say for instance the NSAC tests for blood doping for the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight.....

........If a fighter got severely injured in a subsequent fight in which the NSAC did only urine tests, and it was found later on that the fighter who did the injuring was an a banned substance that could have been detected if they had used blood tests........the NSAC could be held liable for not doing in subsequent fights what they did in testing for Pacquiao-Mayweather.

The reason to test both blood and urine of fighters is that its less likely that a cheat gets through the cracks that way.......and if the NSAC already knows this, (which it would be proven they did if they went ahead and tested the blood of Mayweather and Pacquiao), there commision would be littered with lawsuits brought fourth by injured fighters who the NSAC did only urine tests for.

The NSAC is in a predicament if it is they who do the testing for Mayweather-Pacquiao. It they test their blood, they're setting a precedent and they must now test the blood for all fighters under their jurisdiction.

The NSAC cannot pick and chose who they will and will not test blood for doping. They cannot discriminate in that way. Its all or none, Bob Arum knows this, which is why he's proposing what he'd doing now, for the NSAC to decide. Arum knows that by law, the NSAC cannot specify just one fight for testing......Its called discrimination.

If this fight takes place in early 2010, there is really no choice but to bring in an external agency to do the testing......the NSAC will have nothing to do with that external agency, but will have to by law conduct their own urine tests as that is what is protocol in Nevada.

 

Lets get real here my friend, Mayweather had no reason to suspect they were doping.

Manny Pacquiao did himself a disservice by kicking the snot out of a very good fighter in Miguel Cotto who is btw much naturally bigger than is Manny Pacquaio.

Pacquiao went through a much bigger Miguel Cotto like a hot knife through butter, and that is more than reason to raise eyebrows and suspect that Manny is on something.

Maybe Manny is not.......but if he is not, there really is'nt a legit reason not to go through with the testing being proposed.

I propose that instead of Manny bitching about not wanting his blood tested..... he should for the sake of getting under Mayweather's skin, demand a million additional dollars out of Mayweather's own pocket if he wants him to go through the hassle of getting his arm pricked!

 

the demand came from floyd's camp

i was thinking a million dollar fee if pac passes the test :yep

 

When did Floyd accuse Manny of doping?