Fight of the Week #29: The Year was 1982...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by George Crowcroft, Nov 29, 2019.


Question?

Poll closed Dec 9, 2019.
  1. Multiple Fight Themes?

    5 vote(s)
    71.4%
  2. 1/2 fights a week?

    1 vote(s)
    14.3%
  3. Group Chat?

    1 vote(s)
    14.3%
  1. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    nah I wasn’t calling you on it. I did the same thing in round 9, after seeing my error I checked the other cards. No biggie just want to be as accurate as possible. When I tabulate 5-8 cards I frequently make mistakes and just wanted to minimize them
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  2. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    Well the judge scorecards, this week or month or fortnight? Whatever it is? Don’t really matter as not one fight went to the cards but here goes anyway:

    Arguello vs Pryor I consensus:
    1 Pryor 4-0
    2 Pryor 3-1 (George the lone dissenter)
    3 Even 2-2
    4 Pryor 3-0-1 (Jel the lone dissenter)
    5 Arguello 3-1 (Philly the lone dissenter)
    6 Pryor 4-0
    7 Pryor 3-1 (Jel the lone dissenter)
    8 Arguello 3-1 (George the lone dissenter)
    9 Arguello 3-1 (George the lone dissenter)
    10 Pryor 4-0
    11 Arguello 4-0
    12 Pryor 4-0
    13 Arguello 3-1 (Jel the lone dissenter)

    the consensus verdict is 125-123 or 7-5-1 in favor of Pryor at TOS

    Thanks to all who scored:

    Pryor cards:
    @George Crowcroft 126-121
    @rorschach51 124-123
    @PhillyPhan69 125-122
    @Jel 125-123

    we saw 1-6-10-11-12 the same with 4 going to Pryor and 1 to Arguello
    Making for 8 swing rounds with at least 1 dissenter.
    George and Jel disagreed with the consensus in 3 separate rounds
    Philly disagreed with the consensus in 1 round
    Rorschach held the consensus line in every round
     
    George Crowcroft, rorschach51 and Jel like this.
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    Mancini vs Kim consensus among 5 judges

    1 Kim 5-0
    2 Mancini 4-1 (George disagrees with the majority)
    3 Mancini 3-2 (George/Rorschach disagree)
    4 Kim 4-1 (Rorschach disagrees)
    5 Mancini 5-0
    6 Mancini 2-1-2 (none of us agree lol)
    7 Mancini 3-2 (Philly/Rorschach disagree)
    8 kim 4-1 (George disagrees)
    9 Kim 5-0
    10 Mancini (10-8)/9-9) 4-1 (George disagrees)
    11 Mancini 5-0
    12 Mancini 5-0
    13 Mancini 4-1 (rough disagrees)

    consensus Mancini up 126-120 at TOS

    kim cards- none

    draw card
    @George Crowcroft 123-123

    Mancini cards
    @rorschach51 125-121
    @PhillyPhan69 125-121
    @roughdiamond 125-122
    @Jel 126-121

    we had 5 rounds in agreement 1-5-9-11-12 for a 4-1 Mancini edge.
    Round 6 where we all saw it different (2-1-2)
    And 7 disagreeable rounds
    George disagreed with the consensus in 4 rounds
    Rorschach disagreed with the consensus in 3 rounds
    Philly/rough disagrees with the consensus in 1 round
    Jel held the consensus line apart from round 6 where we were very divided!

    thanks to all who scored the fight!
     
  4. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    Gomez vs Pintor consensus 4 judges

    1 Gomez 4-0
    2 Gomez 3-1 (George disagreed)
    3 Pintor 4-0
    4 Gomez 3-1 (Jel disagreed)
    5 Pintor 3-1 (George disagreed)
    6 Even (10-9 Pintor w/deduction) (2 Pintor 10-8—2 Gomez 9-9)
    7 Gomez 2-1-1 (George/Jel disagree)
    8 Gomez 4-0
    9 Gomez 3-1 (Philly disagreed)
    10 Pintor 2-1-1 (Rorschach/Jel disagree)
    11 Gomez 4-0
    12 Pintor 3-1 (Jel disagreed)
    13 Pintor 4-0

    124-122 by consensus at TOS

    5 rounds the same Gomez up 3-2 (1-3-8-11-13)
    1 even round
    7 swing rounds
    George/Jel disagreed 4 times
    Rorschach/Philly disagreed 1 time

    Gomez cards
    @rorschach51 124-121
    @PhillyPhan69 123-122
    @George Crowcroft 123-122
    @Jel 124-123

    thanks to all who participated
     
    George Crowcroft, rorschach51 and Jel like this.
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    Navarrete vs Choi consensus 5 judges

    1 Choi 5-0
    2 Navarrete 5-0
    3 Choi 3-2 (George/Butt disagree)
    4 Choi 5-0
    5 Choi (10-8) 5-0
    6 Choi 3-2 (George/Butt disagree)
    7 Navarrete 5-0
    8 Choi 3-1-1 (Rorschach/Jel disagree)
    9 Navarrete 4-1 (George disagreed)
    10 Navarrete 5-0
    Navarrete down 95-93 at TOS

    We had 6 unanimous rounds (1-2-4-5-7-10)
    And 4 swing rounds
    George disagreed 4 times with the consensus
    Intentional butt disagreed twice
    Rorschach/Jel disagreed once
    Philly held the consensus line

    Navarrete cards
    @IntentionalButt 95-93

    Draw cards
    @George Crowcroft 94-94
    @Jel 94-94

    Choi cards
    @PhillyPhan69 95-93
    @rorschach51 95-94

    thanks to all who scored this one
     
    George Crowcroft, rorschach51 and Jel like this.
  6. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    Sanchez vs Nelson consensus 5 judges

    1 Nelson 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
    2 Nelson 2-1-2 (we all disagree)
    3 Sanchez 3-1-1 (scar/Rorschach disagree)
    4 Nelson 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
    5 Nelson 5-0
    6 Sanchez 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
    7 Sanchez (10-8) 5-0
    8 Sanchez 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
    9 Sanchez 5-0
    10 Nelson 2-1-2 (we all disagreed)
    11 Nelson 5-0
    12 Nelson 4-1 (ETM disagreed)
    13 Nelson 3-0-2 (scar/etm disagree)
    14 Sanchez 4-0-1 (Jel disagreed)
    Consensus Nelson up 133-132 at TOS

    we agreed on 4 rounds 3 for Sanchez 2 for Nelson
    3 split rounds 2-1-2 both for Nelson

    and 6 swing rounds
    Jel disagreed with 5 consensus rounds
    Scar/etm disagreed with 2 rounds
    Rorschach disagreed with 1 round
    Philly held the consensus line apart from the 2 split rounds 2-10

    nelson cards
    @scartissue 135-133
    @rorschach51 133-132

    draw cards
    @PhillyPhan69 133-133
    @Jel 133-133

    Sanchez cards
    @ETM 136-132

    thanks to all who participated
     
    George Crowcroft, Jel and rorschach51 like this.
  7. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    George Crowcroft, Jel and rorschach51 like this.
  8. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
  9. Jel

    Jel Reserving the right to be inconsistent Full Member

    4,200
    5,864
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 20, 2017
    Apparently I need to go on some kind of judging course - jesus, how did I manage to disagree on 5 consensus rounds?! That's terrible!
     
  10. Jel

    Jel Reserving the right to be inconsistent Full Member

    4,200
    5,864
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 20, 2017
  11. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,899
    9,936
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Dec 20, 2006
    nah, it does not mean that at all...could be they were close rounds...could be you are right and everyone else is wrong...could be a case of choosing body punches over head shots or heavy blows over volume...I have had fun scoring with you over the past year, sometimes we agree sometimes we don’t, I have never looked at one of your cards and though anything...keep on keeping on bro
     
  12. Jel

    Jel Reserving the right to be inconsistent Full Member

    4,200
    5,864
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Oct 20, 2017
    Well, my only consolation (apart from your kind words, of course) is that my overall points tallies were on par. I didn't come up with a horrendously one-sided scorecard so perhaps you can keep the Adalaide Byrd trophy on ice for now...
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2019