Fight the best or fight for money?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by alexthegreatmc, Jan 2, 2015.


  1. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    Legacy and fame are nice, but they don't put food on the table. You can't use legacy or fame to buy food.

    Being the best doesn't mean anything if you're broke.
     
  2. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Yea, rules are rules. I see how technically Cotto is the best middleweight. This is similar to the Baldomir/Margarito situation.
     
  3. tarugojones

    tarugojones Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,877
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
    No legacy ,no fame means no money.
     
  4. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    this is ridiculous, mone is not a coward.


    no boxer is a coward. zaghe.
     
  5. Florez

    Florez Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,134
    0
    Sep 7, 2011
    Mayweather calls himself "TBE", why fight Cotto again when Mayweather had already defeated him via UD @ 154?

    Martinez even offered to go down in weight and a higher purse for Mayweather back in 2012 but Mayweather ducked Martinez to fight Cotto that year.
     
  6. MrPook

    MrPook Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,322
    3,330
    Apr 15, 2007
    I think its fine if a guy holds a belt he takes some money fights first. They are pro and they need to take care of themselves and their family's.

    But After they made a few million. How much money do you really need you know.
     
  7. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    I don't buy into the whole "I'll come down in weight" BS that some of these fighters spew for a payday. If they could comfortably fight at the lower weights, they would. After fighting at X weight for so long, going back down for a fight won't be that easy.
     
  8. shortydee

    shortydee Active Member Full Member

    1,300
    4
    Sep 8, 2012
    Mayweather would NOT be crucified for fighting Cotto at 160.
    155:think:think:thinkmaybe.

    However, the Chavez Jr sweepstakes is just something GGG wants in on. He'll fight anyone on PPV just to break thru. He'll fight Cotto at 155-160, Mayweather at 150-160, Canelo @ 155-160, Pac @ 150-160 or JCCJr at 160-168.

    He wants nothing more than to be your PPV favorite.

    And it seems the only way HBO is gonna allow K2 to impose him as a PPV exclusive, is to beat another PPV fighter and bring big #s.
     
  9. technocrato

    technocrato Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,105
    300
    Dec 12, 2009
    Boxing is a dangerous and risky sport. Fighters should go for the money fight as soon as they can.
     
  10. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Hockey and Football are both extremely dangerous sports as well, where the athletes are just as prone to concussions or and many other potential injuries boxers aren't typically exposed to. If the Blackhaws and the Seahawks just decided one day that they weren't going to play to the contenders in their division, what do you think the fans of those sports would say?
     
  11. DanishPride

    DanishPride Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,001
    4
    Nov 22, 2010
    Not to this extent. Mayweather has perfected it. Just look at his last fight demanding that Maidana wear bigger gloves. When has that ever happen before in boxing history
     
  12. janeschicken

    janeschicken hard work! deadicayshin! Full Member

    20,570
    19
    Nov 10, 2007
    Exactly.. Mayweather has openly set the precedent and the effects of that were so prevalent in the lack of quality matchups that took place in 2014. You know have guys like Quillin who are OPENLY admitting that Golovkin is too high risk/low reward, and not being held accountable for it.

    More and more fighters are going to start doing it, and all boxing fans will suffer as a result.
     
  13. Bobthepen

    Bobthepen Active Member Full Member

    772
    5
    Nov 16, 2014
    Are you kidding? Have you ever seen the limitations Sugar Ray Leonard placed on his opponents?

    Fighting with pillows on hands in a ring the size of a small moon, catchweights, etc?
     
  14. marksman

    marksman Sharpshooter Full Member

    166
    0
    Mar 26, 2009
    Ridiculous comparison! Hockey players and football players are on A SALARY!! Lose, get injured and have to sit out the rest of the year, no problem the money still rolls in! Boxers? Don't fightÂ…don't earn! U lose a football match, no problem you can still be top of the league and play again next week. Lose a fight you're "exposed", "a fraud" etc and your career takes a big hit.
    Of the 10 or so fighters you regularly watch how many 100's, 1000's didn't make it to that level but still endured the punishment. Boxing is a brutal sport with no aftercare! I would never begrudge a fighter for seeking the big money
     
  15. shortydee

    shortydee Active Member Full Member

    1,300
    4
    Sep 8, 2012
    He's only 32, and has only been in 3 tough fights, and has NEVER weight drained. His weight between fights is right around 170.

    All's he needs to do to make weight is trim a bit of belly fat, and he easily makes 160.

    Similar to Floyd and Pac now.....he's fighting right at his natural, filled out, adult weight.

    A fight with Chavez Jr would defo take something out of him, and if he bulked up to 180 to fight at 168, I could see him aging trying to come back down to 160 or less for $$$ fights b/c he'd have to cut muscle, and one usually loses legs when they do that, ie Chad Dawson, RJJ, JLOT.

    If he stays S of 168 he will dominate his division for no less than 8 more yrs. And that's assuming he becomes the PPV star he should already be.:hi: