'Fighter of the Year' must go to Mayweather

The Ownership of 1930's film wannabe RKO atschmay bad, FRKO begins

 

it's not that, your basically saying that I HAVE NO CREDS based on who i think is the GOAT....that right there is ****en childish and it says alot about you...

 

No, you admitted to being biased against PBF cuz you don't like his style. And picking fighters because of nationality is a bias, like it or not. It's the very definition of bias.

You have me cornered? With what? Your opinion that PBF bores you? Yes, that was such a damaging representation of fact.

I don't care if you care or not. I can post my dissent as much as you do. Why are you so angry that I have?

 

No, I said you are biased, and you are. And after all the **** you post on this board about not liking this or that fighter and calling people all kind of ****, don't play martyr. The fact that you're trying says alot about you. You resort to jokes and name calling whenever you can't back up a statement.

You're not biased? But you pick fighters based on nationality? Ok then........

 

This content is protected

 

Kelly Pavlik should be chosen as fighter of the year for 2007.

Mayweather's close decision over a past prime De La Hoya was not impressive. Ricky Hatton was a smaller opponent, with a serious disadvantage in reach (26'' to 20'' arm length). Most people knew Mayweather would win.

Most people predicted Pavlik would lose his fights with Miranda and Taylor, yet he won both in a spectacular way. In Taylor, he defeated the universally recognized prime middleweight champion. In Miranda, he defeated a young, powerful puncher that everyone else was afraid of.

 

me, angry

i dont just hate mayweathers style, every fighter that fights like that gets on my nerves...wether it's the sweet science or not, it ****en get's under my skin....especially when you've been talking down on ATG'S and upping your status since you were a young un-proven fighter.....

for me, it's all about respect homie...and even though after a fight floyd shows it sometimes, he says how he truly feels when he's around his fake posse of fake gangsters.....

but in the ring, the man is awesome in some peoples eyes, that's cool...i just dont like his stlye....

 

Never was and never will be...

 

You do know that Mayweather started at 130 and Hatton is a natural Jr. welterweightatsch

 

Here's a good one from our film friend RKO:

" And Floyd won't KO Ricky, that's for sure. Ricky will be laughing at Floyd in this fight."

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=878994#post878994

atsch:rofl

 

You're calling people names, it's not a sign of happiness.

And I just said, you don't like his style. I said you were biased against that style....you just admitted to it. Perhaps I need to make myself clearer. You don't like that type of fighter, pick against them, and rate them accordingly. Is that not a bias?

So then why are you so upset. I told the truth. You like Mexican fighters and skilled brawlers and pressure fighters for the most part. Nothing wrong with it, but it still makes you biased when you disregard the greatness of fighters with a more defensive style.

 

the best 154lb

and the best 140lb, the only problem is that he didnt fight him at 140 :deal

 

The fight between Mayweather and de la Hoya had the same importance as Cotto - Mosley...when it comes to boxing - in terms of money PBF takes it all...

 

I though it could go to Pavlik since mayweather only fought once, but now that he has beaten Hatton...its no dought that its Mayweather

 

You mean more entertaining.