Fighters Getting "Ruined"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Marnoff, Jan 4, 2009.


  1. "TKO"

    "TKO" Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,386
    806
    Jun 23, 2007
    Incidentally, Ricky Hatton gets "ruined" on a nightly basis between fights but is still on top of the division!
     
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,178
    Jun 23, 2005
    David Reid against Tito Vargas against Tito Tito ruined alot of fighters.
    Taylor against Chavez
    I don't think Calzaghe ruined Lacy he wasn't all that in the first place he was very limited and flawed with a bunch of KOS over no-hopers. His shoulder injury also helped to contribute to his downfall as well.
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    To be clear I'll add again that there certainly ARE cases of fighters getting ruined in a single fight, but they are uncommon. Most of the time a bad loss is just that, and there is no reason to believe it really "destroyed" a fighter the way it is often suggested.
     
  4. diamondDave

    diamondDave Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,264
    11
    Jul 21, 2004
    Golota v. Bowe
    Golota v. Sanders

    Even if Golota lost he always had the potential to wreck your career...just look at Michael Grant too.
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,340
    9,955
    Jun 23, 2008
    David Reid was never gonna be anything special anyway, and was rushed into the Tito fight because his ppl wanted to cash him out due to his eye.

    Taylor would have ruled 140 for some time had Chavez not been around. He might not have been "ruined" by that fight, he was never the same afterwards either. Vargas was never the same after the Tito fight either.

    An example of a fighter truly "ruined" by a fight is Mugabi after Hagler was done with him.
     
  6. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,340
    9,955
    Jun 23, 2008
    I see someone is a Golota nut hugger.

    The Holyfield trilogy ruined Bowe... that and his terrible eating habits. The Bowe that fought Golota was a shell of the Bowe of 92-93.

    And Golota didnt ruin Grant... he just exposed him. Grant was always destined to fail... he was a huge hype job.
     
  7. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Taylor wasn't quite the same post-Chavez, but he was still a pretty good fighter.

    He took too much punishment in general. That Norris fight was a poor decision by management in my opinion.
     
  8. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    There was no "allegedly" about it. They found steroids in his system after the De La Hoya through the drug test. He took them, no ifs, ands, or buts about it.
     
  9. Mookhound

    Mookhound Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,610
    3
    Oct 11, 2008
    Quite agree. I've always thought that thogh Holyfield lost the final battle, he won the war as Bowe looked dreadful in by halfway through the third fight (Holy walked on to a HUGE shot that started to be his downfall) and then the Golota bouts
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    This post was in response to this:


    So I say Calzaghe was a far better boxer and beat him convincingly, but because I dont believe that a points defeat psychologically ruins a fighter and his abilities to compete, I am considered to be carrying out some sort of vendetta against Joe Calzaghe????

    :lol: Words fail me. The mentality of the Fanboy Playground beggars belief sometimes. Grow the **** up please, for all our sakes.
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    What is very tiring and pathetic is childish accusations whenever any point is made that even features Joe C. His fans are becoming feverish in their desperation to defend him against attacks that aren't even being made.

    My post was more about the thread-subject, more about Lacy, more about what ruins a fighter and what doesn't, than it was about Joe Calzaghe - but because his name featured, the slavering fanboys must spring into action, eh?! (even when I make note that Calzaghe was the far superior boxer and won easily!!!!! Unbelievable.)

    I often hear it said that the Calzaghe defeat "ruined" Lacy. It is the most often heard example of what this thread is about.

    Personally, I don't believe a wide points defeat does that to a fighter. I think it is more likely to be the shoulder surgery that has hampered Lacy's ability to detonate his best weapon.

    If saying that makes me a "blind hater", then you can go **** yourself, I'm happy to keep posting what I believe.
     
  12. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    :good
     
  13. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007
    Some fighters can be ruined, mostly due to a destructive defeat. But in the case of Lacy, he was limited to begin with, and after he lost the wide UD to Calzaghe he had surgery and lost the ability to use the only real weapon that he ever really had.
     
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    This has lead to some interesting debates, and seems to highlight the grand ambiguity and dissent over what it even means for a fighter to be "ruined". A lot of confusion arises out of us having no steadfast definition of what "ruined" constitutes.

    Does "ruined" mean the fighter immediately declined following the fight in question, but was still a top fighter? Does it mean that a fighter could no longer perform not only at his best, but at the elite level at all?

    It would be interesting to get some input as to how people view this term to dispel some of the confusion surrounding it.
     
  15. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Some (many) will disagree with this, but I think today's fighters are much more finely tuned machines - generally speaking - than the old timers were, and they are pushing their bodies much harder. To succeed at the top level in today's game you have to be at your absolute optimum both physically and mentally, and a bad beating can take that mental edge away, which sometimes is enough to drop an A level fighter down a notch. This doesn't apply in every case, but I think it's the case more often now than in the old days and that's why you see more fighters show such a dramatic decline in performance after one bad shellacking than you used to.