Fighters of the Century per Futch/Dundee/Clancy/Duva/Chargin - The Welterweights.

So had they by the looks of it.

 

How many top wins does Hearns have at 147 though?
He wasn't ever considered the real champion there. He has a great win against Cuevas but not much else. He fought a couple of other names but they were a bit past it or not even much good.

 

He was a bit of a weight bully at welter

 

Did Chargin pick Armstrong #1?

 

I would have Hearns and Trinidad on the list

 

If this is H2H, then Hearns should be on the list.

But as @Unforgiven has said, he didn't have a top 10 resume

 

I think that Basilio is too high, that Leonard should not be above Napoles, and that Luis Rodriguez is probably too low.
Tommy Hearns was not, let me repeat, WAS NOT, an unbeatable juggernaut at 47. He was carefully matched and thus relatively uneducated. There are more than a few that would have defeated him on the night he fought Leonard.
Tommy at 47 is becoming the equivalent of "young Foreman."

 

how bout Jack britton ted kid lewis ,barbados joe walcott ?

 

But maybe more than 10 welterweights have better resumes.

 

Britton is the worst omission on that list, by far.
Ted Kid Lewis would make my top 10. Walcott maybe.

 

You can start with the top 10 you posted in the OP.
Which ones does Hearns have a better resume than ?

Hearn was never even world champion at 147, and failed when he challenged for it. Then he moved up the divisions.

 

I think Hearns might have a better resume than Basilio or Rodriguez at 147 on that list.