Reid, Woodhall, Sheika as an example in rebuttal. Two former WBC champions in their prime or near, plus one young touted American coming off a win against Glen Johnson, none of the fights in Wales.
This thread wasn't made to bash Calzaghe. Just to point out that some records are bull****, and the real record of top fighters is how they did against good fighters.
a fighters pro record starts with his first fight. i like watching a boxer build up his recoprd, stepping up in class as he goes along. you are basically talking about every boxer that ever fought, they've all fought stiffs, all of them,.
gamboa could be an exception, so could david haye. They have both fought people with good records early in their career.
No your not your angry, you hate him and thats what prompted you to make that statement. Im not concerned and neither is anyone else.
i'm sure Calzaghe's losing a lot of sleep over the demented rantings of a keyboard tough guy. next time you bump in to Jeff Lacy be sure to let him know how you feel. i'll send you some grapes.
He won the supermiddlewt title in 1997 from Eubank (45-2-2) and made 17 defences, before Lacy and Kessler. The records of his opponents in those defences were: 14-1-0 50-8-3 26-1-1 23-2-0 22-1-0 20-1-0 26-2-0 30-0-0 29-2-0 37-8-0 21-1-0 39-4-0 25-2-1 18-1-0 23-3-0 45-1-0 24-1-0 Then there was undefeated IBF champ Lacy 21-0-0, who was more highly touted than Pavlik is now, who was going to destroy him. And after Bika, 20-1-2, there was undefeated WBA/WBC champ Kessler 39-0-0, whom many on here said Calzaghe would never fight. And then Hopkins at 48-4-1. Overall in championship fights, his opponents had a record of 600-44-8.
Kessler never fought BHop, and didn't lose to him. The rest of your post is too stupid to merit a response.