Fighters that couldn't be beaten in a brawl

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Sep 20, 2019.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,154
    46,332
    Mar 21, 2007
    This is interesting to me, these are fighters that couldn't be beaten by brawling. They got be out-boxed, out-moved, out-thought, there were ways to beat them but you couldn't out-and-out outfight them. They're also some of my favourite fighters.

    What's fascinating to me is how different they are. There are similarities - and a granite chin is among them so I won't be mentioning chin from hereon in - but it's the differences that make them really really interesting. Here are some of them, maybe you'll add a couple or tell me why i'm wrong.

    Kid Gavilan

    KG, the keed, was actually out-brawled, but only late in his career by the likes of Ramon Fuentes. When the two met when KG held the title, the champion out-brawled him at a canter to take a ten round decision.

    Most instructive on film is his first fight with John Bratton. Bratton tried a hybrid style, giving ground, brawling, giving ground, brawling, trying to pick his spots. Gavilan split his jaw and dominated him savagely for fifteen rounds for his trouble (the third fight seems to have been an even worse beating).

    This content is protected


    Check out two minutes for an instructive spell. Bratton goes all in on a brawled exchange and is consistently out-hit. The last despairing left hook he throws over the top before getting beaten back is really sorrowful and it made me sad to see it - KG then just tees off on him with right hands as he's going back, bludgeoning him to the ropes. In colour this fight would be stopped during the follow-up barrage KG lands on him. This is just the first round :lol:

    In the second, Bratton spoils (forgivably) but in the third he's back on the front foot and mixing lead-rights in with a body attack. KG stays low, invites him in and tries to counter. Very patient. It's amazing how much he makes Bratton miss while letting him run this round. Brawls break out at 4:50, 5:50 and KG puts the frighters up Bratton in both - then he goes to his boxing and runs some rounds together.

    But Gavilan just waits. Bratton's reputation was for a fighter who boxed and then made quick war in the final few seconds of the round. Gavilan, I think, plotted to win all of those exchanges and he did so on the evidence of the truncated film we have here. It's masterful execution that rather reminds of the undoing of an honourable mention, more of which later.

    And that's the key to the Keed's anti-brawling style. Patience. He waits and waits for the right moments to out-brawl the opponent. His excellent defensive skills keep him out of trouble in the meantime against all but the likes of Robinson and his absolutely elite stamina - Keed is in the top 0.001% here - means he can deliver on his trap for the fullness of fifteen rounds if required. His dearth of power meant it was often required. He's the best advertisement for an anti-brawler who can't hit.

    Dick Tiger

    Tiger is a bit of an anomaly power-wise. Terry Dowens described being hit by him like being hit by a bag of coal, but he didn't score that many knockouts. I think the problem was that people just knew they didn't belong in the pocket with him so they didn't allow themselves to get hit that much. Tiger's weakenss was boxers but he turned a lot of very rugged men into sub-standard boxers who didn't have a hope in hell of beating him because they didn't want to fight him.

    His record against brawlers was absolutely outstanding. Florentino Fernandez the huge Cuban puncher tried it on against Tiger in 1962 and Jesus Christ did he get a shellacking.

    This content is protected


    Tiger went right for him and I think got hurt to the body in their very first exchange. Sometimes Tiger showed a slight inability to adapt, and perhaps his greates weakness was he felt that if a fighter was "running away" from him, that fighter was losing. He complained endlessly after losing such a contest that there wouldn't have been a fight if it weren't for him and therefore how could he have lost it? A minor swarming adaption could have brought him even greater success. But in brawls he consistently read the messages brilliantly. Look at Tiger's guard for the rest of this fight - elbows tucked in, slightly low, over his front foot, coming in behind a punch, taking it close. It's a perfect designation for avoiding punishment to the body. (Dumphy's observation that Tiger has his "gloves up high" in commentary is not accurate - rather he has his chin down very low). Tiger crowds his man and it comes at the expense of getting hit with combos when he gets caught on his heels, but he leads with punches of phenomenal commitment; a great defence when undisturbed is married to surety in his ability to hold a punch when he is found while attacking.

    Tiger used solid boxing ability to force the brawlers hand and then consistently out-fought him. But key to his unbrawlability (now a word), is his phenomenal strength. Tiger looks like a modern-day steroid freak in his musculature but this was not for show, nor was it a numbing draw on his limitless stamina. His functional strength was off the charts; he once threw the strong Gene Fullmer straight to the canvas during a test of strength. Brawling Tiger was like fighting iron. While The Keed used his smarts, Tiger relied upon his enormous strength and durability to make himself the brawler's bane.

    Of course, Tiger was famously out-brawled - but dragging his 5'8 frame up to light-heavyweight to take on perhaps the deadliest puncher in the history of that division isn't relevant here. All these fighters could be out-brawled if we look at this example - Gavilan could be out-brawled by Hagler, and so on. Brawling outside your weight division is asking for trouble.

    1970s/60s Bantamweights and some Honourable Mentions

    I want to stop here and take a note of the elite bantamweight brawlers of the Olivares era. These men were not brawlers remember, none of these guys are, these are the anti-brawlers, the guys it is impossible to brawl and win, but there were a horrible vipers nest of them in and around this era. Olivares was eventually out-brawled by Herrara; Hererra in turn was out-brawled by Olivares; Harrera and the perhaps the greatest contender in bantamweight history Chucho Castillo swapped fights where one out-braweld the other for spells; Olivares out-brawled Castillo - in amongst this madness were elite brawlers like Pimentel and Borkhorser, it was ****ing crazy. This is worth mentioning for two reasons - one, any one of these guys deserves an anti-brawling passage of their own and their rivalries are instructive of a fact: specifically that there is no such thing as a fighter that is immune to brawlers :lol: which kind of defeats the purpose of the thread, but i'm pitching something near-as here. Anyone can land a perfect punch.

    Which leads me to the definitive HM, Manny Pacquiao. Wtf are you doing trying to outbrawl Manny you ****ing nut? Well, Marquez was trying to finally get the nod. IMO he won II and III with skills but in the end he chucked in the towel and instead roided up and decided to knock his man out. And it worked and it was very very beautiful. He drew Manny into brawls, changed the angle, dipped and punched, something he'd been doing throughout their rivalry but upon which he never relied as definitive strategy. Here, he did, changing Manny from the ultimate anti-brawler to the ultimate KO victim in a high-level brawl. Tough break.

    The same can be said for Roberto Duran. Watching him reduce the brawling Barkley to a victim (it was close but come on) is one of the most special things i've ever seen in boxing. His left-handed strategy to keep Hagler off him was also a thing of incredible beauty. Unfortunately he ran into Tommy Hearns and got outbrawled onto his face, like Manny. Tougher break.

    Finally, I want to mention Vitali Klitschko. He's promlematic because he was only involved in one out and out brawl and he lost it :lol: But it was on a cut. He has all the attributes required to be outbrawlable and I'm not sure I would bet on anyone other than Lennox to pull it off, and perhaps not twice. Tough luck Vitali.

    I was gonna do Sandy Saddler/Henry Armstrong as a comparison but 10,000 characters is my lot :lol:
     
  2. The Undefeated Lachbuster

    The Undefeated Lachbuster On the Italian agenda Full Member

    4,862
    7,525
    Jul 18, 2018
    Chavez, Hagler, Foreman, Marciano.

    Every person they fought that tried to brawl with them ate canvas. Unmatched.

    Honorable mentions: Ketchel, Graziano, LaMotta, McClellan, Walker, Holyfield.
     
    Turnip mk3, Balder, RockyJim and 6 others like this.
  3. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,014
    18,944
    Jul 25, 2015
    Amazing post McGrain.

    And now the word 'brawl' doesn't sound like a real word!

    For me, Sung Kil Moon was a (anti?) brawling monster. Awkward, unique sense of timing, and hands, body and will made of concrete. The only one who come close at 115lbs for that is Khaosai IMO, but Moon is better for me. The timing of those incredible overhand really were unique.
    Tae Shik Kim also had some stupendous brawling, even if only for one truly great performance.

    For the Koreans, you could also mention Chang. Extremely dynamic, skilled and crafty, with a truly excellent defensive radar for the style (when sharp). Probably the most naturally gifted (or whereabouts) in my mind. Exchanging with him was asking for trouble. Like KG, his lack of power could actually make it worse as he would grind you down and break your will, whilst being barely damaged in return.

    Eduardo Lausse is one I'd say you could never consistently exchange with. The ridiculous power that he carried, along with that dynamic, spring like defense, left even Fulmer on **** Street and more desperate for survival than a clear win. That amazing left hook of his was like a scythe, and the Turpin style rolling really predicated his success with this particular shot.

    Harada had the pure physicality at Flyweight, and uniquely had a very skilled, elite jab even when raw IMO. That mauling of Kingpetch is a testament to his brawling / swarming ability H2H at 112. Pascual Perez is also in a similar light, though his shortness even for that weight became a crazy advantage.
     
    ron davis, TipNom, ecto55 and 9 others like this.
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,154
    46,332
    Mar 21, 2007
    ^ Some cool nominations.
     
    ETM, ecto55, George Crowcroft and 2 others like this.
  5. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,014
    18,944
    Jul 25, 2015
    In my mind, it's possible that it takes even more talent to be a top shelf brawler than boxer, since usually they will have picked up some of the skills of the boxer.

    Nearly every elite could exchange at some capacity, even if not like a Dick Tiger. It's one of the things that seperates an Elite from a very good IMO. Hell, even Canto, midget boxing Maestro with no power, could exchange some viciously fast left hooks. Well, he was Mexican!
     
    George Crowcroft and KeedCubano like this.
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,154
    46,332
    Mar 21, 2007
    One cool thing about this subject is it's very hard to nominate heavies or cruisers. Once you meet a certain minimum requirement for weight there are just too many very hard punchers in the division for it to be likely. Even if you cordon them off into little weight islands and nominate anti-brawling styles there are too many guys on those islands who could end a fight with one combination for anti-brawling to really negate the opponent.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  7. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,749
    12,911
    Oct 20, 2017
    Jesus dude, how the **** are you only 19?! Great post.

    EDIT: sorry - that may have sounded patronising but wasn’t meant to be. Wish I’d been that clued up about the sport at your age.
     
  8. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,014
    18,944
    Jul 25, 2015
    Like I said in that other post, my dad's a boxing coach (UK). I've been around boxing since like 7 - 8 years old. My dad told me to study a few fighters when I was younger; that's how I ended up here with you fellas!
     
  9. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,749
    12,911
    Oct 20, 2017
    Ah, nice one. Keep up the quality posts my friend.
     
  10. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,014
    18,944
    Jul 25, 2015
    Thanks.
     
  11. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,812
    Aug 26, 2011
    When I first saw the title, the very first person that came to my mind was D. Tiger. Very cool thread.
     
    Tonto62 and ETM like this.
  12. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,225
    7,098
    Sep 11, 2018
    I’m astonished he’s 19. It’s great to see fans that age that still are this deeply about the history.
     
  13. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,225
    7,098
    Sep 11, 2018
    Tiger is the first fighter that came to mind here.
     
    ETM likes this.
  14. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,014
    18,944
    Jul 25, 2015
    I think Johnny Tapia might be a good mention as well. Though he was a better boxer.
     
    Seamus, ETM, Clinton and 1 other person like this.
  15. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,392
    3,794
    Jun 28, 2009
    @McGrain and @roughdiamond......feck both of yooz, you've nicked all the good uns. Great posts, I feel like sicking carrots in jealousy.

    So, Rodrigo Valdez. Him vs Tiger would've been like two land masses colliding.

    Fenech? Nelson got him eventually and irreversibly cracked his jaw after being pasted first time round but as far as skilled, swarming brawlers go, it'd& take something to drive him back around his best weight.