Fighters that never moved up in weight classes

atsch every titlist in his division, long time 122 lb titlists Bungu, Barrera, Vazquez, etc.

 

Barrera couldn't beat Pacquiao, but could beat Morales....who BTW, beat Pacquaio.

See how that works? Just because Hamed lost to Barrera doesn't mean he can't compete and defeat other great fighters. One has nothing to do with the other.

Bottom line, your original assertion was incorrect. Hamed obviously did change divisions and win. Why didn't he move up to 130? Who cares....you said he didn't move up at all.

 

Ricardo Lopez ---> ATG

 

he moved up...went 1-0-1 with that nicaraguan guiy

 

Yes, losing to an ATG is being exposed.

Right....so Pacquaio exposed Barrera? Since he beat him on a few weeks notice and in his first fight at 126? This is your logic correct?

Sorry, just because I don't share your hatred for Hamed doesn't mean he conned me. Perhaps you're just ill informed. It's a distinct possiblity. You should get that taken care of.

PS. Barrera didn't KO him because it would have involved too big a risk. That's why he didn't go for the KO. Barrera's power at 126 was fine.

 

Yeah I just looked. Last 4 of his 52 fights.

3 lbs, meh thats close enough.

 

No, it just means beating the best fighters before moving up. Not literally beating every fighter within the division. Common sense please.

 

He was dropped at 105, not 108.

You don't even know what you're talking about :deal

 

Oh ok.....so what you're saying is, Hamed is penalized for losing to Barrera because it was Barrrera's first fight at 126 and he beat Hamed.

But Barrera isn't penalized in your eyes for getting KO'd by Pacquiao in his first fight at 126 and on a few weeks notice at that?

Like I said, you're logic is lacking.

On top of this, and this may boggle your mind, perhaps those punches Barrera landed didn't stop Hamed because, oh I don't know, he has NEVER been stopped? Hamed always had a good chin, but horrible balance.