Fighters who unfairly get labeled as being boring?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by BENNY BLANCO, Aug 31, 2010.


  1. nahkis

    nahkis Robbed Full Member

    0
    1
    Nov 7, 2009
    Lewis was also unfairly labeled as glass chin, dirty fighter and a crap commentator. I call bull**** on all counts. Everybody knows the man had/has no flaws.
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    Winky Wright and Pernell Whitaker for me. So many people brand those two defensive and boring, which constantly amazes me considering the amount of punches both guys throw.
     
  3. The Guvnor

    The Guvnor Active Member Full Member

    703
    1
    Mar 17, 2008
  4. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Floyd Mayweather
     
  5. Nicky P

    Nicky P Jamiva Boxing Full Member

    1,432
    8
    Jul 21, 2010
    Bernard Hopkins.

    And is it true that at the time he fought, people labeled Charley Burley to be boring?
     
  6. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Mayweather/Pea
     
  7. john garfield

    john garfield Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,826
    99
    Aug 5, 2004


    If people were judging only off the Billy Smith fight (his only bout recorded), I can see why.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,703
    46,366
    Feb 11, 2005
    To play devil's advocate, Hopkins' spends an inordinate amount of time not fighting in the ring. He risks very little, spoils, holds, cheats, whines... It's not so much boring as it is not fighting. If you want to label the above as "boxing" you are entitled to do so but I always feel he is avoiding boxing far too often. And I am not speaking about the things he does very well, counter punching, moving his opponent with footwork, ring generalship, picking off punches... those things are brilliant.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think it was the fact it was those 2 in a row, Hatton and Mosley were entertaining, especially for a fan watching them live. I goto say my gf thought the JMM fight was like watching paint dry though
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    After the age of 35 Hopkins has spent less time fighting, before that age he'd fight for the full round and be a much more exciting fighter

    People that think Hopkins and Toney have great stamina are wrong, they are great at pacing themselves, but don't have great stamina
     
  11. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Yeah, maybe Hopkins/Jones II was boring, but not prime Hopkins.

    Mayweather is boring IMO. He has some exciting performances when an opponent pressures him but otherwise it's just the same old pot-shot and hold routine on repeat, often coupled with low workrate, zero killer instinct and lack of depth to his game.

    Lewis could be thoroughly yawn-worthy.
     
  12. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Griffith I find probably the worst fighter to watch in history. Monzon isn't far behind either.
     
  13. Korean Hawk

    Korean Hawk Member Full Member

    439
    2
    Aug 29, 2010
    You need to watch more Griffith.

    What fights of Griffith's do people find very boring?
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,591
    27,258
    Feb 15, 2006
    I never found Ezzard Charles boring to watch, but he didnt do it for the contemporary fight fans as heavyweight champion.
     
  15. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    47
    Sep 6, 2008
    Benvenuti, Monzon, Napoles, apart from the parts where he was getting a shellacking. The Paret fights were alright.