Fighters who were never the same mentally after a loss?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by scarecrow, Jun 4, 2016.


  1. scarecrow

    scarecrow Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,880
    125
    Dec 13, 2015
    It's got me thinking lately. The advantages of an unblemished record mentally. And the advantages of a blemished record mentally.

    A lot of fighters take a loss while they are green or even prime and it alleviates the pressure of being undefeated.
    And they just go for it from then on.

    Likewise some fighters feed off of an unbeaten record and use that mentally and build up confidence that nobody can defeat them. And once they lose they've lost that mental edge.

    I thought of Prince Naz and George Foreman as two fighters who simply could not stomach defeat mentally.

    George was still a young fighter and didn't take much physical pain in the Ali fight. He was outsmarted and out schooled by the better man that night. He should have had many more years on top. Yet he just couldn't cope with losing. He went on to knockout like 5 men in one night after the loss in an emotional tirade. And simply wasn't the same ever after the loss. He still had all his physical tools but couldn't stomach losing mentally.

    As for Hamed. He was a gimmack. A sideshow. He was exposed by the first great well schooled boxer puncher he fought. He discovered that he simply didn't have it in him to be great. He just wasn't good enough and needed to improve technically to achieve greatness. He couldn't face his own reality. So he retired at 27 or 28 and got fat as hell.
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,560
    27,187
    Feb 15, 2006
    Terry McGovern springs to mind.
     
  3. scarecrow

    scarecrow Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,880
    125
    Dec 13, 2015
    Going way back. Nice.
     
  4. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    Meldrick Taylor.
     
  5. First Round KO

    First Round KO Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,998
    719
    Sep 14, 2013
    As for Hamed. He was a gimmack. A sideshow. He was exposed by the first great well schooled boxer puncher he fought. He discovered that he simply didn't have it in him to be great. He just wasn't good enough and needed to improve technically to achieve greatness. He couldn't face his own reality. So he retired at 27 or 28 and got fat as hell. Spot on, Hamed was exposed by Barrera as a fraud, he was beat both physically and mentally, he is now just an obese dwarf cokehead.
     
  6. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    calling a guy who brought the spotlight to the lighter divisions a gimmick and sideshow is downright disrespectful and plain incorrect.

    naz achieved plenty.
     
  7. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,489
    5,239
    Jan 19, 2016
    I find Naz one of the most objectionable sportsmen in my lifetime but have to admit that he was brilliant. Untouchable at his best and undefeated against very good opposition for nearly 7 years. I believe he would have beaten Barrera if he had stayed on track. I hate to agree but it's true that he achieved plenty. Could have been much more but he still achieved a lot.
     
  8. UFC2015

    UFC2015 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,083
    380
    Sep 12, 2015
    Tyson? His invincible aura ended after douglas

    Sent from my SM-G925W8 using Tapatalk
     
  9. steve21

    steve21 Well-Known Member

    1,901
    3,343
    Jan 19, 2015
    John Tate after the Weaver KO ... saw that as part of an unprecedented ABC four-fight broadcast. Remember when championship fights were free?

    spt
     
  10. Jacko

    Jacko Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,536
    8,691
    Apr 25, 2008
    Lacy, Bute, Groves.
     
  11. scarecrow

    scarecrow Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,880
    125
    Dec 13, 2015
    His gimmackery is what brought the attention to the very low weight classes.

    Don't you remember the HBO broadcast? The way they were talking about Naz was really negative. They couldn't believe what was gappening. Hamed was being exposed as a gimmack who could counter and finish B level talent.

    But against the elite he was made to look off balance, short, ineffective and raw. Devoid of any technical ability.
     
  12. davidjay

    davidjay Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,310
    894
    Feb 23, 2009
    The ultimate example. He ruled by fear and with his first loss that was gone forever.
     
  13. metalmickey

    metalmickey New Member Full Member

    34
    0
    Mar 11, 2016
    Hamed's downfall started when he stopped listening to his trainer Brendan Ingle and then dumped him.
    He stopped training properly and started to believe all the hype and praise.
    At his best he had fast feet and hand speed, great defensive reflexes, threw punches from crazy angles and had KO power in both hands.
    Shame on him for his unprofessional attitude by the time he fought Barrera.
     
  14. chocolatito

    chocolatito New Member Full Member

    96
    3
    Nov 5, 2015
  15. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    61,134
    23,698
    Jul 21, 2012
    Bowe ruined Hide , Golota and Gonzalez.

    Gonzalez was dedicated very serious about his career as a pro before Bowe battered him senseless.
    He Buster Douglas'd after that loss.