Fighters with the Best Chance of Beating Chad Dawson

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Axe, Oct 9, 2008.


  1. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    He wasn't slow,he was using his speed to get good timing and accuracy and counter punching well at times.If you mean limited in boxing by not using his jab,then yes,but he had good upper body movement,using his legs pretty good.Proved as good chin.Except the stamina he didn't look all that good,plus Henry fought a hell of a fight and Diaconu was sick,overtrained,big layoff etc but those are excusesAbraham is a lot smaller than Dawson also
     
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    He bulked up a lot in the past year,he might get to be bigger and can say goodbye to ever fighting below 175
     
  3. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    My opinion on who has the best chances at beating Dawson..

    01. Antonio Tarver
    02. Glenn Johnson
    03. Adrian Diaconu
    04. Joe Calzaghe
    05. Zsolt Erdei
     
  4. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Good list. :good

    No Pavlik?
     
  5. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
    calzaghe would ud dawson 10 out of 10 times. with out a doubt in my mind.
    i would even edge to pavlik on beating him.
     
  6. Jaaames

    Jaaames Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,854
    0
    Feb 16, 2006
    Not too long ago, Dawson was a super middleweight, and if im not mistaken, he started at middleweight.... I think Bute could give Dawson a tough fight.... A lot of these guys dont need one punch power to affect Dawson.. Remember, Chad has been dropped a couple times... against Harding and Adamek... Erdei could also be a problem for Chad...
     
  7. Sandmanl337

    Sandmanl337 Pactard Full Member

    6,647
    0
    Apr 6, 2008
    I don't Pavlik could beat Dawson right now at this point in time.. Give him another year or two or maybe a couple more fights at 168 and higher, then maybe.. I really don't give Diaconu or Calzaghe that good of a chance to be honest.. More likely 65-35.. I think Tarver has the best chance out of anybody right now to beat him.. Though he's older than the young Dawson, he still isn't shot.. He still has the tools and skills and he did look pretty impressive against Woods.. If Dawson doesn't bring his A-game, he could lose widely or get KO'd.. This is like a 51-49 fight for me lol..
     
  8. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    I see Dawson-Tarver as 60/40 in Dawson's favour, so I agree it is definitely a very dangerous fight.

    Dawson-Pav could be a domination for Dawson for virtually the entire fight, but if Pavlik lands just one money punch, it could be all over for Bad Chad...
     
  9. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Highly unlikely.
     
  10. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Also, I would say Hopkins has a decent chance of beating Dawson because he can take whatever Dawson has to give for 3-4 rounds, by which time Dawson starts coming in more, and then, he has the finishing skills to do the business by half time, just like Johnson was about to do. Hopkins shouldn't be discounted here, I think.

    Also, I think Diaconu has a higher chance of beating Dawson than Tarver, because he punches harder and is more aggressive.
     
  11. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Pavlik wouldn't touch him at 175
    Calzaghe would beat him,no way Dawson would be favorite
    Tarver he is gonna beat
    He would be favorite vs Diaconu but you never know with his chin
    How would he be a significant favorite vs Johnson when he almost lost to him in april?
    He would probably beat Erdei in a somewhat tough contest,Erdei hasn't fought somebody good in a while so he might not adjust
     
  12. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Not to mention the fact that Tarver is relatively flat footed and old, and honestly, Dawson SHOULD put on a boxing exhibition.

    Unfortunately for Dawson, as many posters here have cited, is that Dawson sometimes gets lured into a fight and doesn't stick to the gameplan.
     
  13. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    capfunds, this is what a straight talking Yorkshireman said recently:

    "Dawson will beat Tarver easily. Whoever fought Tarver after me, would beat him. He wasn't good against me. I was truly awful that night."

    ...Tarver isn't active enough and he doesn't put enough power behind those combos to beat Dawson, I think. Lucky punch, maybe...but anyone could beat Dawson with a lucky punch.
     
  14. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Clinton is right:good
     
  15. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Thank you for using my username and taking my reply seriously.

    Honestly, I feel you're one of the best posters on this site, but because you don't fall in with the majority of posters with some of your views, you're ostracized in a way where you don't get the credit that you deserve.

    It doesn't matter though. I would imagine that most of the posters that believe them to be the most knowledgable have never put on a pair of gloves or they're the type that don't realize that their Floyd Mayweather or Roy Jones impression that they do on the bag is embarrassing and likely will lead to a beating once they get into the ring.

    But staying on topic, I agree with Woods, who I believe that you're refering to, that the much younger and fresher Dawson will outbox him to a relatively wide decision, especially after the lesson he was taught after engaging to much with Johnson.