Fighters you dislike

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Aug 5, 2007.


  1. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    John L. Sullivan. The guy was probably one of the most built up athletes in sports history. His style was primitive, he ran away from Peter Jackson, and his unfounded attitude towards blacks was disgusting.
     
  2. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,248
    Jun 30, 2005
    Built up?

    Re: Racism. Yes, he was extremely racist...but at least he suffered similar hatred as a result of his own ethnicity (Irish) from the predominantly Anglo-Saxon culture at the time. Racism is more understandable when (like Ali's) you encounter prejudice yourself.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,111
    27,478
    Jan 3, 2007
    Excellent post,

    How daft of someone to make some of the uninformed statements that the last author made regarding Leonard's career, or that of his opposition's . Duran was 28 years old, and would continue to fight for years to come. Hearns was a world champ in his prime. Hagler was one of the best middleweights of all time, and had a tremendous adavantage over Leonard for the reasons you gave.

    Thanks for correcting Vantage West, as some people should really do their research before speaking/writing.
     
  4. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    322
    Dec 12, 2005
    On the contrary, John L's racism against blacks was particularly asinine precisely because he was on the receiving end from the host culture.
    If John L badmouthed the English, well okay, that is a bit more understandable. But blacks? If he had more character, he'd have been more sympathetic! He's the victim of bullying who himself becomes a bully.

    Malcolm X said that "black racism is [by and large] a reaction to white racism" and is far more understandable. But if Malcolm hated Puerto Ricans because of what the Irish did to him that brands him with the same rebuke.
     
  5. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    Took the words right out of my mouth. If Sullivan wants to hate the British, let him hate the British, since they are the people his anger should be directed at. But to hate a different people that did nothing to you is simply unacceptible.:good
     
  6. DocDevil

    DocDevil Member Full Member

    420
    10
    Jul 30, 2006
    Iron Duke,watched the fight when it happened,and that is the way I still remember it.A whinning,complaining Jimmy Young turning the crowd against Forman.Young and his camp,complained to the media about Foreman weeks before the fight.George hands were tied from fighting his fight.Anyway,could not force myself to watch that again.
     
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,248
    Jun 30, 2005
    I don't see it that way. Hating a group of people for their skin color, ethnicity, etc. is equally irrational regardless of what some of them have done in the past. It makes about as much sense as holding guys with webbed toes responsible for Stalin, or blaming blue-eyed, brown haired Austrians for Hitler.

    Sullivan was a racist who suffered racism, and so was Ali. If Sullivan believed the English were racially inferior, his belief would be just as stupid.
     
  8. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,248
    Jun 30, 2005
    It's strange, but often true that individuals forced to the bottom of the social ladder dislike other persecuted groups as much as they do their persecutors.
     
  9. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,111
    27,478
    Jan 3, 2007
    Bizarre, but often true.
     
  10. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,248
    Jun 30, 2005
    One wonders why. :huh
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,248
    Jun 30, 2005
    Or, to put it another way: If I tried to justify hating the Mongolians because their distant ancestors destroyed half the civilized world, it would be just as asinine as hating the Mongolians for no reason at all. You can't hold a "race" (dubious term by the by) responsible for its ancestors and/or people who look like them.
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,111
    27,478
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed,

    To this day, a lot of cultures disdain the English for some of the atrocities performed in the days of the monarchy, which coincides greatly with the wrongful blame that you're illuding to.
     
  13. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    75
    Nov 20, 2006
    John Ruiz
    Naseem Hamed
    Mayweather Jr
    Riddick Bowe
    Hector Camacho
    James Toney
    Mike Tyson (more so post prison)


    Many of these guys were/are hellishly talented fighters, but ultimately nasty people.
     
  14. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,248
    Jun 30, 2005
    At the same time, the English abolished slavery around the world--the only culture in history to have done so. They brought Parliamentary democracy to quite a few nations that had previously been living under petty kings (India, for instance), and brought the rest of the world up to speed technologically.

    Mind you, they were not unequivocal altruists. A brief look at imperial history will demonstrate that. Especially in their early days, they were guilty of exterminating several groups of relatively innocent people (there's a fiery furnace reserved for some Guianan planatation owners, I'm sure). But when the Victorian English took over during the days of high imperialism in the 19th century, they managed to eliminate a surprising number of the world's problems.

    Each generation has its own characteristics and voice--modern Americans are culturally no closer to their Civil War ancestors than they are to Russia or Finland. For that matter, within a generation there's so much diversity that hating "white people", "English", or anybody else is stupid in the extreme.
     
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,111
    27,478
    Jan 3, 2007
    I'm reffering to when the Monarchy was the chief body of rule in Britain, and thus a world empire.